Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Approval Under Section 151. Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six Years Without Proper Sanction from Specified Authority Held Invalid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vibrant Securities Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange, challenged a reassessment notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-15. The notice was issued beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The petitioner contended that the approval for issuing the notice under Section 151 was granted by a Joint Commissioner, whereas as per Section 151(2), for notices issued after the expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the approval must be from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director. The court examined the provisions of Section 151 and noted that the time limit for issuing notice under Section 148 depends on the amount of income escaped assessment. For cases where the notice is issued after six years, the approval must be from the specified higher authority. In this case, the approval was granted by a Joint Commissioner, which was not the competent authority. The court held that the reassessment notice was invalid due to lack of proper approval and quashed the notice. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements for reassessment notices, particularly the requirement of approval from the correct authority based on the time elapsed.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment - Section 148, 151 Income Tax Act, 1961 - Validity of Approval - Petitioner challenged reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 for AY 2014-15 issued under Section 148 - Notice was beyond six years from end of relevant assessment year - Approval under Section 151 was granted by Joint Commissioner instead of Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director - Held that approval by Joint Commissioner was invalid as per Section 151(2) which requires approval of Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director for notices issued after expiry of six years - Reassessment notice quashed (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year is valid when the approval under Section 151 was granted by a Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the reassessment notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-15, holding that the approval under Section 151 was invalid as it was granted by a Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director, as required for notices issued after six years.

Law Points

  • Reassessment notice under Section 148 requires valid approval under Section 151
  • Approval must be by specified authority based on time elapsed
  • Notice beyond six years requires approval of Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director
  • Approval by Joint Commissioner invalid for such cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (03) 33

Writ Petition No. 3423 of 2022

2024-03-18

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2024:BHC-OS:4951-DB

P. J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate, with Madhur Agrawal and Upendra Lokegaonkar, i/b. Mint & Confreres, for Petitioner; Suresh Kumar, for Respondents-Revenue

Vibrant Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Income Tax Officer, Ward No.4(2)(1), Mumbai; Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Income-tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi; Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, PCIT, Mumbai-4; Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of reassessment notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-15.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the reassessment notice on the ground that the approval under Section 151 was granted by a Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director, as required for notices issued beyond six years.

Issues

Whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year is valid when the approval under Section 151 was granted by a Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the reassessment notice dated 31.03.2021 for AY 2014-15 was issued beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year, and as per Section 151(2), approval must be from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director, but the approval was granted by a Joint Commissioner, rendering the notice invalid. Respondent-Revenue argued in support of the notice, but the court found the approval invalid.

Ratio Decidendi

For reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued after the expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the approval under Section 151 must be granted by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director, and approval by a Joint Commissioner is invalid, rendering the notice void.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner, a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange (“BSE”) and the National Stock Exchange (“NSE”), is challenging a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). The notice is for Assessment Year 2014-15 and was issued beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The approval under Section 151 was granted by a Joint Commissioner, whereas as per Section 151(2), for notices issued after the expiry of six years, the approval must be from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director. The reassessment notice is quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging a reassessment notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-15. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 18 March 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court upheld the ITAT's decision to delete the transfer pricing adjustment made by the Revenue, finding that the com...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Enquiry Notices Against Cooperative Society for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 64 of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959. Notices Issued by Deputy Registrar Without Proper Application of Mind and Without Disc...