Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Sub-Divisional Officer in PMLA Case Alleging Illegal NA Permission in CRZ Area. The court held that the applicant satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA and was entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, was the Sub-Divisional Officer at Dapoli and was arrested on 13/03/2023 in connection with ECIR No. ECIR/MBZO-I/57/2022 registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The ECIR arose from a private complaint by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change alleging violation of Section 19 and Section 15 read with Section 7 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The applicant was accused of granting NA permission for land in Gat No. 446 at Murud, which fell within CRZ-III, despite knowing that no such permission could be granted. The applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 45 of PMLA. The court considered the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA, the role of the applicant, and the fact that the applicant had been in custody since 13/03/2023. The court noted that the applicant was a public servant and the allegations pertained to his official duties. The court also considered that the trial may take time and that the applicant had no criminal antecedents. The court held that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant was not guilty of the offence and that he was unlikely to commit any offence while on bail. The court granted bail subject to conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail under PMLA - Section 45 PMLA - Twin Conditions - The court considered whether the applicant satisfied the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA, i.e., reasonable grounds to believe he is not guilty and unlikely to commit any offence while on bail. The court analyzed the role of the applicant as a public servant and the nature of allegations. (Paras 1-14)

B) Environment Law - Scheduled Offence - CRZ Violation - Section 15 read with Section 7 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - The predicate offence involved violation of CRZ-III norms by granting NA permission for land in CRZ area. The court noted that the applicant as Sub-Divisional Officer granted NA permission, but the land was later found to be in CRZ-III. (Paras 3-5)

C) Criminal Law - Bail - Delay in Trial - Section 439 CrPC - The court considered the prolonged incarceration of the applicant since 13/03/2023 and the fact that trial may take time. The court held that continued detention may not be justified. (Paras 6-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 45 PMLA in connection with ECIR No. ECIR/MBZO-I/57/2022 for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of PMLA.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted to the applicant subject to conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail under PMLA
  • Section 45 PMLA twin conditions
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Scheduled offence under PMLA
  • Environment (Protection) Act 1986
  • CRZ regulations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 153

Bail Application No.3553 of 2023

2024-02-29

M. S. Karnik

2024:BHC-AS:9792

A.P. Mundargi, Subir Sarkar, Hrishikesh Mundargi, Paavani Chadha, Ashish Chavan, B.B. Kulkarni

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande

Directorate of Enforcement, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Bail application under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 45 PMLA in a money laundering case arising from alleged CRZ violation.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought bail in connection with ECIR No. ECIR/MBZO-I/57/2022 for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of PMLA.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested on 13/03/2023 for allegedly granting NA permission for land in CRZ-III area, constituting a scheduled offence under PMLA.

Issues

Whether the applicant satisfies the twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA for grant of bail. Whether the applicant's role as a public servant and the nature of allegations justify bail.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that he acted in his official capacity and there was no mens rea; the land was not in CRZ at the time of permission; he has been in custody since 13/03/2023 and trial may take time. Respondent ED opposed bail, contending that the applicant knowingly granted permission in CRZ area, and the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA are not satisfied.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant was not guilty of the offence under PMLA and that he was unlikely to commit any offence while on bail, satisfying the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA. The applicant's prolonged incarceration and the nature of his role as a public servant were considered.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The applicant is the accused no.2 in the aforesaid ECIR registered by ED. The applicant was arrested on 13/03/2023.

Procedural History

The applicant was arrested on 13/03/2023 in connection with ECIR No. ECIR/MBZO-I/57/2022. He filed Bail Application No.3553 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court. The court heard the matter and granted bail on 29/02/2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: 3, 4, 45
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986: 7, 15, 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Recovery of Possession. The substantial question of law regarding Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 was answere...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Invalid Delegation of Powers. Delegation Order Under Section 3(2) Must Record Satisfaction Based on Material and Reasons; Absence Renders Delegation and Subsequent Detention O...