Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Transport Officer in Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Matter — Vehicle Classification as Transport Vehicle Affirmed. Division Bench Holds that N1 Category Vehicle Used for Carriage of Goods Must Be Registered as Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(47) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 2(p) of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989....

The dispute centered on the registration classification of a Mahindra Bolero Camper 4WD PSD vehicle purchased by the respondent, Dhilip Kumar. The vehicle was classified by its manufacturer, Mahindra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Excess Pay for Over Five Years Without Employee's Fault Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of the Constitution, Applying Rafiq Masih....

The writ petition was filed by a Sheristadar working under the Subordinate Judge, Tirukoilur, challenging an office order for recovery of excess pay and allowances of Rs.2,73,865. The petitioner had b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition Against CAT Interim Order as Railway Authorities Redress Employee’s Grievance Over Eviction and Medical Board Referral. Employee Challenged Rejection of Interim Stay of Quarters Eviction and Sought Direction for Medical Board Evaluation Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The writ petition was instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a railway employee, Dharmaveer Prasad, against eight officers of the Southern Railway, including the General Manager,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay; Confirms Pay Revision But Sets Aside Recovery Citing Rafiq Masih. Recovery of Excess Salary from Group C Employee Impermissible Under Principles in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih When No Misrepresentation Found and Over Five Years Elapsed....

The Madras High Court considered a writ petition filed by a Stenographer Grade I seeking to quash a notice and proceedings for recovery of Rs.2,59,654/- excess pay and allowances. The petitioner was i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Sets Aside CAT Order for Regularization of Co-Terminus Employee Due to Pre-existing Termination. Order of Termination Dated 05.07.2018 Became Final and Unchallenged, Rendering CAT's Direction for Re-examination Infructuous....

The case arose from a writ petition filed by the Union of India (Government of Puducherry) against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Chennai Bench, which had directed the governm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Allows Appeal by Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and Sets Aside Order Permitting Candidate to Upload Documents Beyond Deadline. Instructions Issued by Recruiting Agency are Mandatory and Cannot be Relaxed by High Court Under Article 226 of the Constitution....

The present intra-court appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a candidate who had applied for the post of Assistant Tourist Officer Grade-II under a recruitment notification issued by the Tamil N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Defendant’s Civil Revision Petition Challenging Refusal to File Additional Written Statement in Commercial Suit. Court Rules that Order VIII Rule 9 CPC Application is Not Maintainable Under Commercial Courts Act Due to Strict Timelines and Availability of Inspection Safeguards Under Order XI CPC....

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner/defendant in the Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai. The petitioner filed its written stateme...