Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal on Seniority List for Assistant Engineers — Merit-Based Assessment Required.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Writ Petition filed by certain Assistant Engineers (Electrical) recruited in 2012, challenging the seniority list prepared by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB). The petitioners contended that the seniority list was based on a roster system rather than merit, as mandated by the Supreme Court in the case of Bimlesh Tanwar. The TNEB argued that the seniority list complied with their regulations and that the petitioners had failed to raise objections within the stipulated three-year period. The learned Single Judge ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that the seniority list was arbitrary and not based on merit. The Writ Appeal was filed by the respondents challenging this decision. The court analyzed the arguments, emphasizing that the seniority must be determined based on merit as per the Supreme Court's directive. The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the learned Single Judge's order and directing the TNEB to prepare the seniority list in accordance with merit within four weeks. The court also vacated the stay on promotions pending the outcome of the appeal. The decision reinforced the principle that seniority should reflect merit in recruitment processes. (Paras 1-39)

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Seniority Determination - Merit vs. Roster System - Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations, 2020, Regulation 97 - The court held that seniority among directly recruited Assistant Engineers must be determined based on merit as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Bimlesh Tanwar, rejecting the roster system as unlawful. The learned Single Judge's order to revise the seniority list accordingly was upheld. (Paras 21-36)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the seniority list for Assistant Engineers should be prepared based on merit or roster system.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Writ Appeal was dismissed, confirming the learned Single Judge's order to prepare the seniority list based on merit within four weeks. The stay on promotions was vacated.

Law Points

  • seniority
  • merit-based assessment
  • direct recruitment
  • Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations
  • Bimlesh Tanwar case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 156

W.A.(MD)No.1221 of 2026

2026-09-23

C.V.Karthikeyan, R.Sakthivel

Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi, Mr.M.P.Senthil, Mr.B.Ramanathan, Mr.G.Karthik, Mr.N.C.Ashok Kumar, Mr.M.Saravanan, Mr.C.Joseph Sathia Neson, Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar

S.Ahamed Arif, Y.Nafesa

S.M.Kanna, P.Reguraja, M.Balamurugan, A.Ashokkumar, V.Thiyagarajan, G.Ramkumar, S.Gopi, V.Gnanasundaram, S.Ayyasamy, V.Sharavanakumar, The Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Corporation Ltd., The Chief Engineer/Personnel, Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Corporation Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Appeal challenging the seniority list of Assistant Engineers.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge.

Filing Reason

The learned Single Judge's order was claimed to be erroneous by the respondents.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge had ruled that the seniority list was arbitrary and not based on merit.

Issues

Whether the seniority list should be based on merit or roster system. Whether the Writ Petitioners raised objections within the stipulated time.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the seniority list complied with the regulations and objections were not raised in time. Respondents contended that the seniority should be based on merit as per the Supreme Court's ruling.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that seniority among directly recruited candidates must be determined based on merit, rejecting the roster system as unlawful, in line with the Supreme Court's directive.

Judgment Excerpts

The seniority among directly recruited Assistant Engineers must be determined based on merit as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Bimlesh Tanwar. The preparation of the seniority list in accordance with roster by the respondent Board was illegal, arbitrary and necessarily has to be set aside.

Procedural History

The Writ Petition was filed challenging the seniority list prepared by TNEB, which was decided by the learned Single Judge before the Writ Appeal was filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations: Regulation 97
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Advocate Enrolment Due to Non-Compliance with Educational Requirements. The court found that the petitioner did not fulfill the necessary conditions for enrolment as an advocate under the Advocates Act, 1961, due ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Directors of Bullion Firms Not Liable for Criminal Breach of Trust. Dispute Over Gold Loan Repayment and Return of Gold Bars Held to Be Purely Civil, Not Attracting Sec...