Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Section 138 NI Act Case Due to Non-Prosecution by Complainant's Partner. Complaint Filed by Partner Without Proper Authorization Not Maintainable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881....

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of acquittal passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai on 30/08/2011. The appellant, M/s. Pinak Bharat and Company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence of Organized Crime. Conviction under IPC for robbery and house-trespass upheld but MCOCA offences set aside as procedural requirements not met....

The appellants, Amar Chauhan (accused No.1), Bittu Mahi (accused No.2), and Dilip Chauhan (accused No.3), were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Act, Pune, in MCOCA Special Case No.13 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration....

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Teacher in Illegal Termination Case. Appointment Without Approval Renders Reinstatement Inappropriate; Section 11(2)(e) of MEPS Act Applied for Six Months' Salary Compensation....

The petitioner, Shri Charudatta Ramchandra Bagadi, was employed as a teacher at Bramhaling Vidyalaya Hajgoli, a school run by Respondent No.1 (Shetkari Shikshan Mandal). His services were terminated b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Regularisation of Contractual Employee in Service Matter. Respondent No.1, initially appointed on contractual basis as Craft Instructor, was regularised after qualifying the regular selection process; the State's petition challenging the Tribunal's orders was dismissed for lack of merit....

The State of Maharashtra and others filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5th February 2021 in Review Application No.2 of 2020, order dated 10th December 2019 in Miscellaneous...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sarpanch's Disqualification for Delayed Caste Validity Certificate. Caste Validity Certificate Obtained After 12-Month Period Does Not Automatically Disqualify Sarpanch Under Section 30(1A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act....

The petitioner, Shri Raviraj Rajendra Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Collector, Kolhapur, dated 12 January 2021, which refused to disqualify Respondent No. 2, Iqbal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Arbitration Award Challenge — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 9% per Annum. Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that in absence of contractual stipulation, pendente lite and future interest shall be at 2% higher than current rate of interest....

The appellant, M/s Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited, an automobile manufacturer, appointed the respondent, M/s Commercial Auto Products Private Limited, as a dealer on 19-10-2005. The respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Due to Failure of Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Mechanism. Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days Triggers Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The applicant, M/s. Mehra & Company, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve dispute...