Bombay High Court Allows Appeals on Interest on Refund Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Interest Payable from Expiry of Three Months from Date of Initial Refund Claim, Not from Date of Tribunal Order. The court followed the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI, holding that the date of initial refund claim is the relevant date for computing interest under Section 11BB.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 52
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Lavino Kapur Cotton Pvt. Ltd., filed four refund applications under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for refund of duty amounting to Rs.59,35,217/- on various dates in 2005, 2006 and 2007. The adjudicating authority rejected the refund claims, but the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the refunds by its order dated 10 February 2016. After the tribunal's order, the appellant filed refund applications on 15 March 2016, and the refund was sanctioned on 31 March 2016. The appellant claimed interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 from the date of the initial refund claims (2005-2007), but the department granted interest only from the date of the tribunal's order (10 February 2016). The CESTAT, by its order dated 13 October 2017, held that the appellant was entitled to interest only after three months of filing of the refund applications after the tribunal order. The appellant appealed to the High Court. The High Court framed the substantial question of law as whether the CESTAT's order was contrary to the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI (2011-TIOL-105-SC-CX), which held that interest is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim, not from the date of the order granting refund. The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the CESTAT order and directing that interest under Section 11BB be paid from the expiry of three months from the date of the initial refund claims, with payment within eight weeks.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Refund - Interest under Section 11BB - The issue was whether interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim or from the date of the order of the authority finally granting refund. The court held that interest is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim, following the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI. (Paras 1-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim or from the date of the order of the authority finally granting refund

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. The order of CESTAT dated 13 October 2017 is set aside. The respondent is directed to pay interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claims (2005-2007) until the date of payment, within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Interest under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act
  • 1944 is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim
  • not from the date of the order granting refund
  • Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI followed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (12) 71

Central Excise Appeal No.121 of 2019 with Central Excise Appeal No.122 of 2019, Central Excise Appeal No.123 of 2019, Central Excise Appeal No.124 of 2019, Central Excise Appeal No.125 of 2019

2022-12-02

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Valmiki Sa Menezes

Mr. Darius Shroff, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Rahul P. Jain i/b Alpha Chambers for Appellant, Mr. Sham Walve a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for the Respondent

Lavino Kapur Cotton Pvt. Ltd.

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Palghar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of CESTAT regarding interest on refund under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought interest under Section 11BB from the date of initial refund claims (2005-2007) instead of from the date of tribunal order

Filing Reason

CESTAT held that interest is payable only after three months of filing refund applications after tribunal order, contrary to Supreme Court decision

Previous Decisions

CESTAT order dated 13 October 2017 in Appeals ST/85044/85046/86545/86555 of 2017

Issues

Whether interest under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim or from the date of the order granting refund

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that interest under Section 11BB is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim, relying on Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI Respondent argued that interest is payable only after three months of filing refund applications after the tribunal order

Ratio Decidendi

Interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claim, not from the date of the order granting refund, as held by the Supreme Court in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. UoI.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the order passed by Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, holding that the appellate company is entitled to interest u/s. 11BB of the Act only after three months of the filing of refund applications after the Tribunal Order granting refund is contrary to the decision of the Supreme court in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. UoI 2011-TIOL-105-SC-CX wherein the Supreme Court held that the interest is to be granted from the expiry of three months from the date of filing of the initial refund claimed and not from the date of the order of the authority finally granting refund and as such bad in law? The appeals are allowed. The order of the CESTAT dated 13 October 2017 is set aside.

Procedural History

Appellant filed refund applications in 2005-2007; adjudicating authority rejected claims; CESTAT allowed refunds on 10 February 2016; appellant filed refund applications on 15 March 2016; refund sanctioned on 31 March 2016; appellant claimed interest from initial claims; department granted interest from tribunal order; CESTAT by order dated 13 October 2017 held interest payable only after three months of filing refund applications after tribunal order; appellant filed appeals to High Court; High Court admitted appeals on substantial question of law and allowed them on 2 December 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: 11BB
  • CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Writ Petition Under Article 226 on Pay Parity for Legal Assistants Transferred to Law Department. Claim of Hostile Discrimination Due to Lower Pay Band Than Direct Recruits in Same Cadre Despite Identical Dutie...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Arbitrator in WAPCOS Ltd. v. Salma Dam Joint Venture. The court held that the arbitration agreement was novated by a subsequent amendment and that the petitioner lacked authority to invoke arbitrati...