Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Case — Reassessment Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Proper Notice. The court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 64(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 by setting aside the appellate order without issuing a show cause notice to the assessee....

The appellant, M/s Sharma Furniture and Interior Decorator, filed appeals under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against an order dated 6.2.2012 passed by the Additional Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree Held Valid. The Explanation defining 'partition' as only by registered deed or court decree is not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14, 15, or 21 of the Constitution....

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased original petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tribunal Order in Excise License Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Relaxation of Distance Rule Under Rule 5 of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 Renders Order Unsustainable....

The petitioner, M/s. Raviraj Enterprises, a partnership firm holding a CL-2 excise license, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 10-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tribunal Order in Excise License Dispute — Petitioner's Business Premises Not Within Objectionable Distance. Rule 5 of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 Relaxation Power Must Be Considered Before Directing Shifting of CL-2 Licensee....

The petitioner, M/s. Raviraj Enterprises, a partnership firm holding a CL-2 license under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, was issued a show cause notice by the Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Haveri Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced from ₹8,32,500 to ₹18,55,000. Deceased was a 28-year-old Software Engineer; Court reduced contributory negligence from 25% to 10% and added 50% future prospects....

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the parents, wife, and minor daughter of the deceased Satisha K., seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Review Petition Under Order 43 Rule 1(w) CPC — Review Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence on Merits. The court held that review is not an appeal in disguise and cannot be used to reappreciate evidence; the review order modifying the appellate judgment was set aside....

The case arises from a suit filed by the respondent (Habeeb Pasha) against the appellants (legal representatives of the original defendants) seeking relief. The trial court dismissed the suit. The res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Orders — State Government's Power to Fix Minimum Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Upheld. The court held that price fixation is a quasi-legislative function and no hearing is required before fixing the minimum price of sugarcane....

The case involves four writ appeals filed by sugar mills (M/s. Sri Chamundeshwari Sugars Ltd., M/s. Shamanur Sugars Limited, The India Sugars & Refineries Ltd., and Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd.) against t...