Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contractor's Challenge to Substitution in Solid Waste Management Contract. Contractor Failed to Show Legal Right to Continue Contract After Termination for Poor Performance Under Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000....

The petitioner, Sri S Gautam Raj, a contractor engaged by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahangara Palike (BBMP) for solid waste management, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals of Landowners in KIADB Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied as Landowners Failed to Prove Higher Market Value. Landowners sought enhanced compensation for acquired lands but did not produce evidence of higher market value; court upheld Single Judge's dismissal....

The case pertains to 16 landowners (appellants) whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for industrial development. The Special Land Acquisition Officer aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged....

The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, sought enhanced compensatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Remands Matter to Tribunal for Fresh Consideration on Input Tax Credit Disallowance. The court held that the Tribunal must decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them without examining the grounds raised by the assessee....

The petitioner, M/s. Manasa Electricals Co., is a trader in electrical goods. For the assessment year 2005-06, the petitioner filed KVAT returns in Form No.100, later revised returns, and annual retur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in KVAT Act Classification Case — Mango Juc-Fit and Other Products Held to Be Fruit Products Under Entry 16 of Third Schedule. The Court ruled that the products are covered by the specific entry for fruit products and not unscheduled goods, reversing the Commissioner's revisional order....

The appellant, M/s. Rasna Private Limited, a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), sought a clarification from the Advance Ruling Authority regarding the classification of i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Industrial Development Board in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Board's Failure to Prove Title and Possession Leads to Dismissal. The court held that the Board, as a statutory authority, must prove its title and possession before seeking eviction, and its failure to do so results in dismissal of the appeal....

The appeal was filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) and its officers against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, D...