Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust's Challenge to Conveyance Order Under Section 5A of MOFA Due to Delay and Lack of Merit. Competent Authority's Order Directing Execution of Conveyance Deed in Favor of Cooperative Housing Society Upheld as Trust Had Agreed to Convey Land and Society Had Complied with Conditions....

The petitioners, A.H. Wadia Trust (a public charitable trust) and its trustees, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th June 2012 passed by the Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966....

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo Mane against the State of Maharashtra, the Kolhapur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Power of Municipal Commissioner to Revoke Occupancy Certificate in Challenge by Co-operative Society and Developer. Core Issue: Whether Municipal Commissioner Had Authority to Cancel Occupancy Certificate Granted Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966....

The writ petition was filed by M/s. Satra Plaza Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, constituted by purchasers o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within 12 Months of Purchase Notice. Land Reserved for Parking Released as Authorities Took No Steps After Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966....

The petitioners, owners of land bearing CTS No. 352 & 352A, Final Plot No. 131/1, 131/2 in Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that Reservation No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Not Sufficient for Reassessment After Four Years. The court held that when all material facts were disclosed during original scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), reopening after four years based on same material is invalid....

The petitioner, M/s. Aditi Constructions, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 on 15 September 2008. The case was selected for scrutiny, and a notice under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows L&T's Challenge to Tender Rejection by MMRDA, Directs Fresh Evaluation of Technical Bids. The court set aside the rejection of technical bid for Package 1 as arbitrary and directed expeditious evaluation for Package 2....

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) against the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) concerning two separate tender packages (Package...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Bogus Purchase Case - Upholds ITAT's Estimation of Profit. Estimation of profit on bogus purchases at 12.5% upheld as reasonable; entire purchase amount cannot be added when purchases are not disputed as genuine....

The case involves two appeals filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for assessme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Held Liable Despite Alleged Breach of Policy Terms. Owner Not Required to Pay Compensation Where Insurance Company Failed to Prove That Vehicle Was Carrying Hazardous Goods at Time of Accident....

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the appellant, Vijay Arvind Pore, the owner of the offending truck, challenged the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara, which had dire...