Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Restoration of Appeal. Delay of 2 years and 2 months not sufficiently explained; court upholds Appellate Court's refusal to condone delay....

The present Writ Petition was filed by the petitioners challenging the judgment and order dated 21.07.2015 passed by the learned Appellate Court in Civil Misc. Application (MCA) No. 28/2014, which dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery. Court held that mere fabrication of accounts without evidence of creating false document with intent to cause damage does not attract Section 467 IPC....

The petitioners, Mr. Nikhil Girish Patt, Mr. Ilesh Shah, and Mr. Sooraj Kumar Tayade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC Against Accused in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery for the Purpose of Cheating. The court held that a letter of credit is not a valuable security under Section 467 IPC and that the chargesheet lacked material to support the additional charge....

The petitioners, Nikhil Girish Patt, Ilesh Shah, and Sooraj Kumar Tayade, were accused in a CBI case registered as RC No.02/E/2013-Mumbai under various sections of the IPC and the Prevention of Corrup...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over property sale consideration held to be purely contractual, not criminal, under Section 420 IPC read with Section 34 IPC....

The petitioners, who were accused in C.R. No.108 of 2014 registered at Ghatkopar Police Station and subsequently transferred to EOW as CR No.40 of 2014, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaints in Commercial Summary Suits for Recovery of Money Lent — Amendments Based on Existing Documents and Admissions of Liability Do Not Introduce New Cause of Action. The court held that since trial had not commenced, the proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 CPC was not attracted, and the amendments were allowed subject to costs....

The judgment concerns three interim applications filed by the original plaintiffs in Commercial Summary Suit No. 13 of 2011, Commercial Summary Suit No. 57 of 2012, and Commercial Summary Suit No. 66 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Plumber in Health Department — No Right to Appointment Merely on Being Eligible. Petitioner failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in written test and thus had no vested right to be appointed....

The petitioner, Subham Suresh Misale, challenged the appointment of respondent No.3, Kiran Suresh Dongare, to the post of Plumber in the Health Department of Maharashtra. The petitioner had applied pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Plumber in Health Department — No Right to Appointment Despite Higher Marks in Written Test. Selection Process Included Interview and Assessment of Overall Suitability, and Petitioner Could Not Demonstrate Arbitrariness in Selection....

The petitioner, Subham Suresh Misale, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9th February 2024 passed by the Maharashtra Administra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid....

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,58,663. The assessment was completed under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure....

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,58,663. The assessment was completed under Section...