Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Tribe Claim — Cites Failure to Consider Valid Certificate of Paternal Uncle and Affidavit of Genealogy. The Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Committee to evaluate all evidence including prior validity certificates and genealogy....

The petitioner, Chaitanya Satish Dervre, challenged the order dated 04.10.2019 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad, which invalidated his tribe claim for 'Thakur' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition for Asset Disclosure Under Section 151 CPC in Pending Suit. The Court held that an application for disclosure of assets by the defendant is maintainable under Section 151 CPC during the pendency of a suit for recovery of money, relying on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi....

The petitioners, Alfredo Fernandes and Arlette J.N. Carvalho, filed a suit for recovery of money against the respondents in the Civil Judge, Senior Division, at Panaji. During the pendency of the suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act....

The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisition of their land under the Land Acquisition Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to MHADA's Rejection of Tenant Eligibility Certification and Revised NOC for Redevelopment. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of the authorities that the developer failed to prove the existence of separate tenancies for the rooms in question....

The petitioner, M/s. S.K. Realty (formerly known as Aum Developer), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 14.09.2022 passed by the 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision in Muslim Divorce Maintenance Case — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Husband's Talaq During Pendency of Section 125 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Wife's Claim Under Section 3(1)(a) of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 for Reasonable and Fair Provision....

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the husband, Khalil Abbas Fakir, challenging the concurrent orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Chiplun, and the Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act Held Not Maintainable for Lack of Jurisdictional Error....

The petitioner, Rohit Dembiwal, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment dated 04.09.2021 passed by the learn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation....

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging PF Recovery Orders Due to Delay and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner failed to challenge Section 7A order within limitation and bypassed statutory appeal under Section 7I of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952....

The petitioner, M/s Siddhi Engineering, a factory located in MIDC Waluj, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Criminal Cases and In-Camera Statements Do Not Establish Disturbance to Public Order as Distinct from Law and Order Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981....

The petitioner challenged an order of preventive detention dated 03/04/2024 issued by the Detaining Authority under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boo...