Madras High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act — Petitioner Granted Liberty to Submit Reply. Court Held That a Show Cause Notice Under Section 7 of the Act Cannot Be Interfered With Under Article 226 Except in Exceptional Circumstances....

The petitioner, Lakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, challenging a notice dated 06.01.2025 issued by the Tah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Panchayat Drainage Dispute. Court Orders Statutory Authority to Decide on Relocation and Maintenance of Drainage Systems Within Three Months Without Expressing Views on Merits....

The petitioner, B. Kannan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Permission to Conduct Kida-Mutu Cultural Event During Temple Festival. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, Kida-Mutuvor Sangam, represented by its Secretary C. Ganesan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachments on Public Pathway — Mandamus Issued Under Article 226. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty....

The petitioner, Dravidaselvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the District C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Unauthorized Road on Agricultural Land Case — Mandamus Issued Without Expressing Views on Merits. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation Within Three Months Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioner, S. Mahalingam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Poromboke Lands — Duty of Statutory Authority to Consider Representation within Stipulated Time. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The petitioner, T. Muniyandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellants, as defendants, failed to prove exclusive title or ouster of co-owners, and the plaintiffs established their half share in the suit properties....

The case involves a partition suit filed by the plaintiffs (respondents) against the defendants (appellants and others) seeking half share in 'A' and 'B' schedule properties. The common ancestor was K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Specific Performance and Injunction. Sale Agreement with Full Payment and Possession Confers Equitable Right Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882....

The plaintiff, Sarojini, filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated June 25, 2003, and for permanent injunction against the defendant, Samidurai (since deceased, represented by hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside First Appellate Court's Decree for Failure to Frame Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC. The Court held that the First Appellate Court's reversal of the Trial Court's decree was perverse and not based on evidence regarding adverse possession....

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Manickammal and others) and the defendant (Arunachalam). The suit property originally belonged to Rathinam, husband of the first plaintiff,...