Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Bias. Court holds that mere registration of multiple FIRs does not establish mala fides or warrant investigation transfer under Article 226 of the Constitution....

The petitioners, Vasanti Rajaram Mane and Amarsinh Balkrishna Mane, filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation in C.R. No.I-177 of 2017, registered at Shiro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Malafide. Court holds that mere allegations of false implication under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 without credible material do not warrant transfer of investigation to CID....

The petitioners, Vasanti Rajaram Mane and Amarsinh Balkrishna Mane, filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking a direction to transfer the investigation of C.R. No.I-177 of 2017 registered at Shirol Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding....

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the land acquisition award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Filed by Secured Creditor and Auction Purchasers, Quashing Attachment Orders of State Tax Authorities. Priority of Secured Creditor Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Held to Override ‘First Charge’ and Non-Obstante Clauses in the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017....

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed a batch of six writ petitions filed by a secured creditor and auction purchasers, quashing various attachment orders, intimations and encumbrance entries...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process....

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petition No. 1462/2019 filed by Mr. Kamal and Loshika B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Application Against Respondent for Willful Breach of Injunction Order in Trademark Infringement Suit. Use of 'NOVA MINI' mark and similar artistic work held to be deceptively similar to registered trademark 'NOVA' and artistic work, constituting contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC....

The applicant, Dr. Ashok M. Bhat, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'NOVA' and an artistic work used for brilliantine hair cream. In 2007, he discovered that Respondent No. 1, Harichand Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses College's Challenge to Maternity Benefit Order, Upholds Employee's Right to Maternity Leave and Full Wages. Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to all establishments, and denial of maternity benefit to a female employee who has worked for 80 days in the preceding 12 months is illegal....

The petitioners, Somaiya Vidyavihar KJ Somaiya College of Arts and Commerce and its Principal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13th July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal to Convert Agricultural Land to Residential Zone Under MRTP Act. The court held that the State Government's decision under Section 20 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 was a policy matter and not arbitrary, thus not liable to be interfered with under Article 226....

The petitioner, a businessman engaged in real estate development in Pune, claimed ownership of lands in Kesnand, Wadebolhai, and Siraswadi villages and held powers of attorney from other landowners. H...