Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Bias. Court holds that mere registration of multiple FIRs does not establish mala fides or warrant investigation transfer under Article 226 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Vasanti Rajaram Mane and Amarsinh Balkrishna Mane, filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation in C.R. No.I-177 of 2017, registered at Shirol Police Station, Kolhapur, to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Pune. The petitioners alleged that the husband of petitioner no.1 was mentally tortured and harassed by threats of registration of false, fabricated, and bogus criminal offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. They claimed that the local police were biased and had registered multiple false FIRs against them. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and police officials, opposed the petition. The court, after hearing arguments, observed that the investigation had already been completed and a charge-sheet had been filed. The court held that the power to transfer an investigation under Article 226 of the Constitution is exercised sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances where mala fides or bias are clearly established. The court found that the petitioners had failed to demonstrate any mala fides or bias on the part of the investigating agency. The mere registration of multiple FIRs, without more, does not warrant a transfer of investigation. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, finding no merit in the petitioners' contentions. The rule was discharged, and no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Transfer of Investigation - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Mala Fides - The petitioners sought transfer of investigation from local police to CID alleging false registration of multiple FIRs under SC/ST Act. The court held that mere registration of multiple FIRs does not establish mala fides or bias, and the power to transfer investigation under Article 226 is exercised sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances. The petition was dismissed as no case for transfer was made out. (Paras 1-6)

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - False Cases - Allegation of Abuse - The petitioners contended that the husband of petitioner no.1 was threatened with false cases under the SC/ST Act. The court noted that the investigation was already completed and charge-sheet filed, and no mala fides were demonstrated. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the investigation in C.R. No.I-177 of 2017 should be transferred to the Criminal Investigation Department, Pune, on the ground of alleged mala fides and bias by the local police.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of investigation
  • Mala fides
  • Article 226
  • SC/ST Act
  • Writ of mandamus
  • Investigation by CID
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 95

Criminal Writ Petition No. 4251 of 2018

2026-07-13

Mrs. Rushali V. Joshi, Sandesh D. Patil

Mr. Dnyaneshwar J. Deshmukh (Through VC) for Petitioners, Ms. Priyanka S. Rane, APP for Respondents-State

Vasanti Rajaram Mane and Amarsinh Balkrishna Mane

State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investigation to CID

Remedy Sought

Writ of mandamus directing handover of investigation to Criminal Investigation Department, Pune

Filing Reason

Alleged mental torture and harassment by threats of false registration of offences under SC/ST Act

Issues

Whether the investigation should be transferred to CID due to alleged mala fides and bias of local police

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the husband of petitioner no.1 was mentally tortured and harassed by threats of false registration of offences under SC/ST Act, and that the local police were biased. Respondents opposed the petition, stating that investigation was completed and charge-sheet filed, and no mala fides were established.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to transfer investigation under Article 226 of the Constitution is exercised sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances where mala fides or bias are clearly established. Mere registration of multiple FIRs does not constitute mala fides or bias warranting transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed in the year 2018 for issuance of writ of mandamus directing to hand over investigation to Criminal Investigation Department, Pune in C.R. No.I-177 of 2017 registered with the Shirol Police Station, Shirol, District Kolhapur. The Petitioners’ case is that: The husband of the Petitioner No.1 was mentally tortured and harassed by giving threats of registration of false, fabricated and bogus criminal offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2018. Rule was made returnable forthwith and by consent of parties taken up for final hearing. After hearing arguments, the court dismissed the petition on 13th July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Bias. Court holds that mere registration of multiple FIRs does not establish mala fides or warrant investigation transfer under Articl...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Send Cheque for Handwriting Expert Opinion in NI Act Case — Rejection of Application by Magistrate Set Aside. Accused's Right to Lead Defence Evidence Includes Right to Seek Expert Opinion on Disputed Signature U...