Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Stop of GPF Recovery for Employees Regularized After CPS. Petitioners Seek Pension Benefits Based on GPF Subscriptions Despite Regularization After Contributory Pension Scheme Implementation....
...
Madras High Court
Sort by:
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Recovered Amount After Quashing of Recovery. Natural Consequence of Quashing Recovery is Refund, and Sub-Judge's Return of Application Held Improper....
The petitioner, a judicial employee, was subjected to proceedings regarding refixation of pay and recovery of an alleged excess amount. In an earlier round of litigation by way of W.P.No.24421 of 2023...
- 14
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Subordinate Judge’s Return of Refund Application in Pay Refixation and Recovery Matter. Holds that Once Recovery Order is Quashed, the Natural Consequence is Refund of Amounts Already Recovered, Independent of Confirmed Pay Refixation....
The dispute arose from pay refixation and subsequent recovery of alleged excess payments from a court employee. The petitioner’s pay was refixed under applicable Pay Rules and Government Orders, and...
- 19
High Court
Madras High Court Disposes of PIL Seeking Bone Bank Establishment in Madurai, Notes Functional Bone Bank Since 2021. Court Requests Legal Services Authority to Conduct Public Awareness on Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 After Bone Bank Established with 197 Beneficiaries....
This public interest litigation was filed by an advocate, who was a law student at the time of filing, under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to est...
- 9
High Court
- 26
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Suspension of Sentence in Custodial Death Case of Minor Suspect. Petitioners, police officers convicted under Sections 343 and 304(ii) IPC for custodial violence causing death, seek bail pending appeal under Section 430 BNSS....
The petitioners, four police officers, were convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai, in SC.No.289 of 2021 for offences under Sections 343 and 304(ii) of the Indian Penal Co...
- 54
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim; Sets Aside Award Passed Under Section 163A After Tribunal Found Deceased Negligent. Court Rules That Conversion of a Section 166 Petition to One Under Section 163A After a Finding on Negligence Is Impermissible, and in Absence of Cross-Objection, Cannot Revisit Negligence Finding Under Order XLI Rule 33 CPC....
In a motor accident claim, the parents of the deceased Ranjith Kumar filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of their son in a road accid...
- 3
High Court
High Court of Madras Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Granting Monetary Benefits for Retrospective Promotion Period; Applies 'No Work, No Pay' Principle to Deny Arrears of Pay for Unworked Period. The Court held that the respondent, a Gramin Dak Sevak appointed as Postman retrospectively with notional fixation from 2010, was not entitled to actual pay for the period he had not discharged duties, as the departmental order had not been challenged and earlier directions were duly implemented....
The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, dated 08.06.2023 in O.A. No. 400 of...
- 11
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Writ Appeal, Holds Application Under Subsistence Allowance Act Not Maintainable Against Cooperative Society; Employee Must Exhaust Remedies Under Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. Special Bye-Laws and Section 153 Govern Subsistence Allowance Claims, and Joint Commissioner of Labour Lacks Jurisdiction....
The dispute arose when an employee of a primary agricultural cooperative credit society, who was suspended on allegations of misappropriation of funds exceeding Rs.1 crore, sought payment of subsisten...
- 35
High Court
Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) Dismisses Defendant's Second Appeal in Promissory Note Recovery Suit — Execution Admitted, Presumption Not Rebutted. Presumption under Section 118 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; rejection of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC upheld....
The dispute arose from a suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note dated 25.06.2007 executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, a dealer in second-hand vehicles, cl...
- 3
