High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Maternity Leave Rule Due to Government Amendment. Court Found Proviso to Rule 101(a) Manifestly Arbitrary and No Further Adjudication Required Following Rule Amendment.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by T.R. Lakshmi under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the legality of the proviso to Rule 101(a) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules, which limited maternity leave to women government servants with less than two surviving children. The petitioner sought a declaration that this proviso was illegal and arbitrary, and requested maternity leave for the birth of her third child from July 2025 to June 2026, along with regularization of her leave taken from 14.07.2025 with full pay and benefits. The Government had amended the impugned rule in G.O.Ms.No.53, Human Resources Management (FR-III) Department, dated 25.08.2026, which extended maternity leave benefits. The Headmaster of the Government Girls High Secondary School, Tiruvallur District, had also passed an order extending maternity leave to the petitioner. The court noted that since the Government had amended the rule in favor of employees, no further adjudication was required. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without costs, and any connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Maternity Leave - Proviso to Rule 101(a) - Legality of Restriction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court examined the legality of the proviso restricting maternity leave to women government servants with less than two surviving children, finding it manifestly arbitrary. The Government amended the rule in favor of employees, rendering further adjudication unnecessary. Held that the writ petition was disposed of accordingly (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proviso to Rule 101(a) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules, which restricts maternity leave to women government servants with less than two surviving children, is illegal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the writ petition without costs, noting the Government's amendment of the rule rendered further adjudication unnecessary.

Law Points

  • Maternity Leave
  • Proviso to Rule 101(a)
  • Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 82

WP No. 43598 of 2025

2026-09-21

S. M. Subramaniam, Krishnaswamy Govindarajan

2026:MHC:3917

Mr. M. Thirumurugan, Mr. S.K. Rameshwar, Ms. RK. Sekina Reshma

T.R. Lakshmi

State of Tamil Nadu and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the legality of maternity leave provisions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a declaration of illegality of the maternity leave rule and sanction of maternity leave.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed the rule was manifestly arbitrary and sought maternity leave for her third child.

Issues

Legality of maternity leave rule restricting leave based on number of surviving children

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued the rule was arbitrary and unconstitutional. Respondents indicated the rule was amended in favor of employees.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the proviso to Rule 101(a) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules to be manifestly arbitrary and noted that the Government's amendment of the rule in favor of employees eliminated the need for further adjudication.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition has been instituted to declare that proviso to Rule 101(a) - Maternity Leave of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental rules, in so far as it states that maternity leave shall be granted to a woman government servant with less than two surviving children is illegal as being manifestly arbitrary. The Government has amended the impugned rule in G.O.Ms.No.53, Human Resources Management (FR-III) Department, dated 25.08.2026.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Government amended the maternity leave rule prior to the court's decision.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules: Rule 101(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application in Land Acquisition Case Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Acquisition proceedin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Discrepancies in Evidence. Court upholds trial court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and ...