High Court Allows Writ Petition for Health Insurance Reimbursement — Directs Fresh Consideration. The court found the rejection order cryptic and lacking detailed reasoning, necessitating a fresh review of the claim under the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a petitioner seeking reimbursement of medical expenses under the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018. The petitioner, who had undergone treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and related complications, claimed reimbursement of Rs.3,23,383/- after his treatment at a non-network hospital was rejected by the State Level Empowered Committee. The petitioner contended that the treatment was emergent and should be covered under the scheme. The respondents argued that the claim was not valid as it violated the policy conditions. The court noted that while the treatment was deemed emergent, the rejection was based on the non-network status of the hospital. The court referred to a precedent which stated that claims should not be rejected solely based on the treatment location if there were valid reasons for seeking treatment elsewhere. The court found the rejection order to be cryptic and lacking detailed reasoning, thus allowing the writ petition and directing the State Level Empowered Committee to reconsider the claim with a reasoned order within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Jurisdiction to Review Administrative Decisions - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court examined the legality of the rejection of the petitioner's claim for reimbursement under the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018, based on treatment received in a non-network hospital during an emergency. The court held that the rejection order was cryptic and required a detailed analysis, remitting the matter for fresh consideration with a reasoned order (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the treatment undergone by the petitioner is covered under the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the State Level Empowered Committee to reconsider the claim with a reasoned order within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • New Health Insurance Scheme
  • 2018
  • emergency treatment
  • non-network hospital
  • reasoned order requirement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 313

WP No. 22356 of 2024

2026-09-18

C.Kumarappan

Mr.Anu Ganesan, Mr.V.Sivalingam, Mr.P.Athi Veera Rama Pandian

Mr.K.S.Karunakara Panneerselvam

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Finance Department, et al.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for reimbursement of medical expenses under health insurance scheme.

Remedy Sought

Reimbursement of Rs.3,23,383/- with interest under the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018.

Filing Reason

Claim for reimbursement was rejected by the State Level Empowered Committee.

Previous Decisions

The claim was considered under the Tamil Nadu Medical Attendance Rules but rejected based on treatment location.

Issues

Whether the treatment is covered under the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2018. Whether the rejection of the claim was justified based on the treatment being in a non-network hospital.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for reimbursement based on emergency treatment. Respondents contended that the claim violated policy conditions due to treatment in a non-network hospital.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for a reasoned order when rejecting claims under beneficial schemes, particularly in emergency situations.

Judgment Excerpts

The claim was rejected on the ground that the treatment was taken in a non-network hospital. The State Level Empowered Committee found justification to take treatment in a non-network hospital.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed challenging the orders of the State Level Empowered Committee regarding the reimbursement claim.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • New Health Insurance Scheme:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Landlord's Contempt Petition Against Tenant for Breach of Undertaking. Respondents found guilty of contempt for misleading the court regarding possession of the suit premises.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Arbitration Award. The Court upheld the arbitrator's speaking award, finding no grounds for interference.