Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition on Maternity Leave Rules — Government Amends Rule in Favor of Employees. The court found the proviso to Rule 101(a) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules limiting maternity leave to women with less than two surviving children to be manifestly arbitrary and unnecessary after the Government's amendment.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, T.R. Lakshmi, seeking a declaration that the proviso to Rule 101(a) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules, which limited maternity leave to women government servants with less than two surviving children, was illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought maternity leave for the birth of her third child from July 2025 to June 2026 and requested regularization of her leave taken from 14.07.2025 with full pay and benefits. The Government had amended the impugned rule in G.O.Ms.No.53, Human Resources Management (FR-III) Department, dated 25.08.2026, which extended maternity leave benefits. The Headmaster of the Government Girls High Secondary School, Tiruvallur District, had also passed an order extending maternity leave to the petitioner. Given the Government's amendment of the rule in favor of employees, the court found no need for further adjudication. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without costs, and any connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Maternity Leave - Proviso to Rule 101(a) - Legality of Maternity Leave Provisions - Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules, 1953, Rule 101(a) - The court considered the legality of the proviso that restricts maternity leave to women government servants with less than two surviving children, finding it manifestly arbitrary. The Government amended the rule in favor of employees, thus rendering further adjudication unnecessary. Held that the writ petition was disposed of accordingly (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proviso to Rule 101(a) of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules regarding maternity leave is illegal and arbitrary.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of as the Government amended the rule in favor of employees, making further adjudication unnecessary.

Law Points

  • Maternity leave
  • Fundamental rules
  • Government amendment
  • Article 226
  • Arbitrary rule
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 81

WP No. 43598 of 2025

2026-09-21

S. M. Subramaniam, Krishnaswamy Govindarajan

2026:MHC:3917

Mr. M. Thirumurugan, Mr. S.K. Rameshwar, Ms. RK. Sekina Reshma

T.R. Lakshmi

State of Tamil Nadu and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the legality of maternity leave provisions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a declaration of illegality of the maternity leave rule and regularization of leave.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed the rule was arbitrary and sought maternity leave for her third child.

Issues

Legality of maternity leave provisions Arbitrariness of the rule limiting maternity leave

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued the rule was arbitrary and unconstitutional. Respondents indicated the rule had been amended favorably.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the amendment of the maternity leave rule by the Government rendered the challenge to the original rule moot.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petition has been instituted to declare that proviso to Rule 101(a) - Maternity Leave of the Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules... is illegal as being manifestly arbitrary. The Government has amended the impugned rule in G.O.Ms.No.53, Human Resources Management (FR-III) Department, dated 25.08.2026. In view of the fact that Government itself amended the rule in favour of the employees, no further adjudication is required.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed challenging the maternity leave provisions, followed by the Government's amendment of the rule, leading to the disposal of the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules: Rule 101(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Scheduled Caste Rights in Land Transfer Dispute — Validity of Sale Without Permission Affirmed. Caste 'Rajaka' Recognized as Synonymous with 'Dhoba' Under Scheduled Caste Order.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in Gruesome Rape and Murder Case — Conviction Based on Strong Circumstantial Evidence.