High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Writ Petition. The court held that disobedience of a court order cannot be termed willful when the order has been complied with, under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971....

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No.12642 of 2020 dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition for Lack of Wilful Disobedience, Grants Liberty to Challenge Order. Respondents complied with writ order by conducting inspection and passing final orders, hence no wilful disobedience....

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Writ Petition. Allegation of Willful Disobedience Not Sustained as Order Under Contempt Was Complied With....

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No.14414 of 2018 dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Encroachment Removal Case Due to Compliance. Respondent's Status Report and Photographs Show Encroachment Removed, No Willful Disobedience Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971....

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Writ Order — Alleged Willful Disobedience Not Established as Inspection Conducted and Encroachments Removed. Court Held That Disobedience Cannot Be Termed Willful Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 When Respondents Conducted Inspection and Removed Encroachments....

The contempt petition was filed by P. Jasbin Beno alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 06.09.2019 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No.11565 of 2018. The writ order had directed th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Supreme Court Stays Underlying Judgment. Contempt proceedings become infructuous when the order alleged to have been disobeyed is stayed by the Supreme Court under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971....

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in W.A.(MD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Land Encroachment Case — Respondents Issued Eviction Order Under Section 6 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, Hence Disobedience Not Wilful....

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in W.P.(MD)No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order to Remove Encroachment. Allegation of Willful Disobedience Not Sustained as Order Was Subsequently Complied With....

The case involves a contempt petition filed by T.Anthonysamy against K.Alagu Mani, the Block Development Officer, and Arul Jothi, the Tahsildar, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Reduces Contributory Negligence from 50% to 25%. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation of Rs. 11,93,000 with interest at 6% per annum under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appeal was filed by the claimants, legal representatives of the deceased Vasappa Koti, challenging the judgment and award dated 01.09.2014 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Rane...