Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Arising from Order in CMA. The matter involved an application under an unspecified provision and challenges an interlocutory order passed in the trial court.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The limited available text indicates that the Bombay High Court heard a Civil Revision Application No. 728 of 2023 filed by Shaikh Mohammad Azahar Mohammad Gouse against seven respondents, including Ishwar Pralhad Dham, Ranjit Janu Burte, Kishor Ramchandra Khare, and others. The application challenged an order dated 19 October 2023 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, in CMA No. 645 of 2022, arising from an application (Exhibit “29”) preferred by respondent no.2 under an unspecified provision. The court, presided over by Justice N. J. Jamadar, reserved judgment on 8 January 2025 and pronounced it on 24 April 2025. Counsel for the applicant was Mr. Drupad S. Patil with Namitkumar Pansare; Mr. Pramod Patil represented respondent no.1; and Mr. Govind B. Solanke appeared for respondents no.3 and 4. The full judgment text beyond the initial paragraph was not provided; thus, the factual matrix, issues, arguments, ratio decidendi, and final decision remain unknown. Consequently, a comprehensive summary cannot be constructed from the available fragment. The matter is identified by citation 2025:BHC-AS:18856.

Issue of Consideration

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 728 OF 2023

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 52

Civil Revision Application No. 728 of 2023

2025-04-24

N. J. Jamadar

2025:BHC-AS:18856

For Applicant: Mr. Drupad S. Patil with Namitkumar Pansare; For Respondent No.1: Mr. Pramod Patil i/b Uday Gaikwad; For Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: Mr. Govind B. Solanke

Shaikh Mohammad Azahar Mohammad Gouse

1. Ishwar Pralhad Dham, 2. Ranjit Janu Burte, 3. Kishor Ramchandra Khare, 4. Bharat Damodar, 5. Firoz Gulam Hussain Shaikh, 6. Adv S. B. Bhele, 7. Dr. Ramnath Jadhav

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Application against an order in CMA No. 645 of 2022

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks to set aside the order dated 19-10-2023 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune

Previous Decisions

Order dated 19-10-2023 by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune in CMA No. 645 of 2022

Judgment Excerpts

This Revision Application is directed against an Order dated 19th October 2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune in CMA No. 645 of 2022, whereby an Application (Exhibit “29”) preferred by the applicant-respondent no.2 under the

Procedural History

An application (Exhibit 29) was filed by respondent no.2 in CMA No. 645 of 2022. The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune passed an order on 19-10-2023. The present Civil Revision Application was filed challenging that order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Arising from Order in CMA. The matter involved an application under an unspecified provision and challenges an interlocutory order passed in the trial court.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Disciplinary Committee's Order in Professional Misconduct Case Under Advocates Act Due to Withdrawn Complaint and Lack of Evidence