High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition as Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. No further adjudication required as the impugned detention order was already revoked....

The petitioner, Amala, wife of the detenu Ganesan alias Jangili Ganesan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. She sought to chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. Preventive detention order revoked renders petition infructuous....

The petitioner, Amala, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, challenging the detention order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid....

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order passed by the second r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority — No Further Adjudication Required. The court held that when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked, the petition becomes infructuous....

The petitioner, Chithra, mother of the detenu Rohith, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. The petition challenged the detention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982....

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution....

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. The petition challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. The Court held that no adjudication is required when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked....

The petitioner, Krishnaveni, mother of the detenu Vasanth @ Bablu, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. The petition sought to qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity of Kanja. Recovery of 2.5 kg Kanja Not Sufficient Ground for Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982; Ordinary Criminal Law Adequate....

The petitioner, Rita, mother of the detenu Lasar Merwin Vijay @ Merwin Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Delay of Over Two Months Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid....

The petitioner, Aburojakani, mother of the detenu Mohammed Yusuf, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the detention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid....

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent (Dist...