High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Bank Service Matter. The court accepted the respondent's submission of compliance and closed the proceedings without further action....

The petitioner, S. Sundarapandian, filed a contempt petition (CONT.P.No.1719 of 2024) before the Madras High Court seeking to punish the respondent, Mr. Suresh Gajendran, Deputy General Manager, Chenn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petitions After Compliance with Order in Writ Petitions. Court holds that once the order is complied with, contempt proceedings are closed, but liberty is reserved for any further grievance....

The case involves two contempt petitions filed by K.Govindaswamy and K.Adilakshmi (in Cont.P.No.1234 of 2024) and R.Komathy (in Cont.P.No.1237 of 2024) against the respondents, who are public official...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.1268 of 2015 — No Costs Imposed. The court accepted the respondent's submission of compliance, affirmed by the petitioner, and closed the contempt proceedings without further action....

The contempt petition was filed by G. Paulpandian against J. Radhakrishnan, IAS, Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.1268 of 2015 — No Costs Imposed. The court accepted the respondent's submission of compliance, affirmed by the petitioner, and closed the contempt proceedings without punishment....

The contempt petition was filed by G. Paulpandian against J. Radhakrishnan, IAS, Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victims with Amputation and Crush Injuries. The court increased the award for the appellant with leg amputation and for the appellant with foot crush injury, considering permanent disability and medical expenses....

The case involves two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against a common judgment and decree dated 19.07.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation for Death of 55-Year-Old Man in Motor Accident, Upholds Negligence of Driver and Vicarious Liability of Owner. Future Prospects at 10% and Multiplier of 11 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, R. Rajendran, who died in a road accident on 10.09.2017. The deceased, aged 55 years, was a sel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was not of essence but plaintiff's conduct showed lack of continuous readiness, disentitling him to discretionary relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963....

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 09.03.2006 for 51 cents of land at Rs.25,000 per cent. He paid Rs.4,80,000 as advance. The agreement fixed one y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order....

The petitioner, Pappubhai @ Ragho s/o Ashokbhai Parmar, through his mother Rambhaben, challenged a preventive detention order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat, classifying ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order....

The petitioner, Kishorbhai @ Boni s/o Bhagwanbhai Solanki, through his wife Solanki Jinkuben, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the Commis...