Case Note & Summary
The contempt petition was filed by G. Paulpandian against J. Radhakrishnan, IAS, Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015. The petitioner sought to punish the respondent for contempt. When the matter was heard, the Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the court's order had been complied with. This submission was affirmed by the petitioner's counsel. Recording these submissions, the court closed the contempt petition without imposing any costs. The order was passed by a division bench of Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice C. Kumarappan on 12.02.2026.
Headnote
A) Contempt of Court - Willful Disobedience - Compliance - The contempt petition was filed alleging willful disobedience of the court's order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015. The respondent's counsel submitted that the order had been complied with, which was affirmed by the petitioner's counsel. The court recorded the submissions and closed the contempt petition without costs. (Paras 1-3)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the contemnor had willfully disobeyed the order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015, warranting punishment for contempt.
Final Decision
The contempt petition is closed. No costs.
Law Points
- Contempt of court
- compliance with court order
- closure of contempt proceedings
Case Details
2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 283
S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan
M.V. Seshachari (for petitioner), A. Arun Babu (for contemnor)
J. Radhakrishnan, IAS, Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Contempt petition for alleged willful disobedience of court order.
Remedy Sought
Petitioner sought to punish the respondent for contempt for not obeying the order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015.
Filing Reason
Alleged willful disobedience of the court order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015.
Previous Decisions
Order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015.
Issues
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the order dated 12.02.2015 in W.P.No.1268 of 2015.
Submissions/Arguments
Respondent's counsel submitted that the order had been complied with.
Petitioner's counsel affirmed the submission of compliance.
Ratio Decidendi
When the court's order has been complied with, as affirmed by both parties, contempt proceedings are closed without punishment.
Judgment Excerpts
The Contempt Petition has been filed for punishing the respondent for having not obeyed the orders of this Court dated 12.02.2015 made in W.P.No.1268 of 2015.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent, submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with. The said submission has been affirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Recording the above submissions, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.
Procedural History
The contempt petition was filed in 2024. On 12.02.2026, the court heard the matter and closed the petition after recording compliance.
