High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition for Bonafide Requirement Due to Lack of Evidence and Changed Circumstances. Tenant's possession protected as landlord failed to prove reasonable and bonafide need for the suit premises under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947....

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute over a suit premises in Nashik. The original plaintiff, Prabhakar (uncle of Sharad), filed a suit for eviction of the tenant (respondent) on the ground of b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petition for Condonation of Delay in Revision. Insufficient Cause for 46-Month Delay Despite Claim of Public Interest....

The petitioner, the Chief Officer of Municipal Council, Kinwat, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 12.06.2008 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, rejecting the applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings on Tenancy Rights Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Petitioners failed to establish ownership of well under Section 38E as they were never declared protected tenants....

The petitioners, Bhaurao Saluba Ekande and Jija Saluba Ekande, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 19th February 1992. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961....

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 in 1975, show...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961....

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of 85 acres 13 guntha. The Special Land Development T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality....

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (the Ceiling Act). H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Complaint in Retail Outlet Dealership Selection Process. Grievance Redressal Committee Must Pass Speaking Order Under Clause 19 of Guidelines....

The petitioner, Sundardas Nagwade, applied for a retail outlet dealership pursuant to an advertisement by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. He was placed at Sr. No. 2. He filed a complaint under Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition in Rent Control Suit — No Subletting or Structural Alteration Proved. Landlord failed to establish that tenant sublet premises or made structural changes without consent under Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947....

The petitioner, original plaintiff, along with respondent Nos. 3 and 4, filed a suit (R.C.S. No. 385/1977) against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Bhusawal, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Tribunal Order Due to Availability of Alternative Remedies. Court holds that direct writ petition is not maintainable when statutory remedies under Section 45(2) of the Ceiling Act are available, and leaves it open to the State to pursue appropriate remedy....

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging a judgment and order dated 24th August 1984 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Surplus Land Determination Tribunal Order for Lack of Alternative Remedy Exhaustion. Court holds that direct writ petition is not maintainable when statutory remedies under Section 45(2) of the Ceiling Act are available....

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the judgment and order dated 24th August 1984 passed by...