High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Permitted to Prosecute Appeals Against Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. Delay of 3 Days Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 151 CPC....

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil applications under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to prefer regular first appeals against a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Maintainability of Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC and Examines Plaintiff’s Readiness and Willingness in Suit for Specific Performance of Agricultural Land Sale Agreement; Trial Court Had Dismissed Specific Performance but Directed Refund of Advance with Interest...

The appeal arose from the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2014 in O.S. No.1/2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tiptur, partly decreeing the plaintiff’s suit for specific performance of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Imposed When Assessment Appeal Is Pending on Substantial Questions of Law. The issue being debatable, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Granted Leave to Appeal Against Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 151 CPC to condone delay where sufficient cause was shown, permitting the appellant to file appeals....

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to prefer regular first appeals against a decr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Sufficient Cause Shown for Delay of 100 Days. Appellant's Bonafide Belief That Husband Was Taking Steps to File Appeal Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Section 151 CPC....

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking condonation of delay of 100 days in filing Regular First ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Permitted to Prosecute Appeals on Merits. The court held that the delay was not intentional and sufficient cause was shown, thus condoning the delay under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to prefer Regular First Appeals against a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cruelty but Acquits of Abetment to Suicide in Dowry Death Case — Insufficient Evidence of Instigation or Direct Link to Suicide. The court held that cruelty under Section 498A IPC was proved but abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC requires active instigation, not mere harassment....

The appellant, Suryabhan Nishane, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 498A (cruelty) and acquitted under Section 306 (abetment to suicide) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Setting Aside Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Death of a Child Does Not Reduce Count for Disqualification. The court held that the disqualification is based on the number of children born, not living children, and the provision must be strictly interpreted....

The petitioner, Premdas Gulab Chavan, challenged the order of the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, dated 06.02.2015, which set aside the disqualification of respondent no.3, Sau. Savita Mil...