Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cruelty but Acquits of Abetment to Suicide in Dowry Death Case — Insufficient Evidence of Instigation or Direct Link to Suicide. The court held that cruelty under Section 498A IPC was proved but abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC requires active instigation, not mere harassment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 32
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Suryabhan Nishane, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 498A (cruelty) and acquitted under Section 306 (abetment to suicide) of the Indian Penal Code. He appealed against the conviction under Section 498A, and the State did not appeal against the acquittal. The marriage took place in 1989, and after a few years, the appellant began ill-treating his wife, Vijaya, allegedly because she was reluctant to use her D.Ed qualification to work. The ill-treatment included giving electric shocks and burning her with cigarette butts. On 15 July 1998, Vijaya set herself and her child on fire, resulting in their deaths. The brother of the deceased lodged a report, and after investigation, charges under Sections 302 and 498A IPC were framed, but the trial court framed charges under Sections 306 and 498A. The trial court acquitted the appellant under Section 306 but convicted him under Section 498A. The High Court considered the appeal against the conviction under Section 498A. The court examined the evidence of witnesses, including the mother and brother of the deceased, who testified about the cruelty. The court found that the cruelty was proved beyond reasonable doubt, as the appellant had subjected his wife to physical and mental cruelty over a period of time. However, regarding the acquittal under Section 306, the court noted that there was no direct evidence of instigation or active abetment to commit suicide. The presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act was not applicable because the cruelty was not shown to be of such a nature as to drive the woman to commit suicide. The court upheld the conviction under Section 498A and dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment to Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Acquittal upheld - Mere cruelty or harassment without direct instigation or active abetment does not constitute abetment to suicide - The court held that the evidence did not establish that the appellant instigated or actively abetted the deceased to commit suicide, and the presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act was not attracted as the cruelty was not shown to be of such nature as to drive the woman to commit suicide (Paras 10-15).

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498A IPC - Conviction confirmed - Evidence of repeated physical and mental cruelty including electric shocks and burning with cigarette butts - The court held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant subjected his wife to cruelty, and the conviction under Section 498A IPC was justified (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's conviction under Section 498A IPC is sustainable and whether the acquittal under Section 306 IPC was correct.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction under Section 498A IPC is upheld. The acquittal under Section 306 IPC is not challenged and remains.

Law Points

  • Abetment to suicide requires direct or indirect acts of instigation
  • not mere cruelty
  • Section 306 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
  • presumption under Section 113A Evidence Act not automatic
  • cruelty must be of such nature as to drive woman to commit suicide
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 151

Criminal Appeal No.251 of 2001

2015-03-03

S.B. Shukre, J.

Mr. R.M. Daga for the Appellant, Mr. A.K. Bangadkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/State

Suryabhan s/o. Bhikuji Nishane

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Section 498A IPC and acquittal under Section 306 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal under Section 498A IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 498A IPC and acquitted under Section 306 IPC; he appealed against the conviction.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 498A IPC and acquitted him under Section 306 IPC.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 498A IPC is sustainable? Whether the acquittal under Section 306 IPC was correct?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence of cruelty was not sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 498A IPC. Respondent/State supported the conviction under Section 498A IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

For conviction under Section 498A IPC, cruelty must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. For abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation; mere cruelty without instigation does not attract the presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 31st August, 2001 passed by 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Case No.666/1998, thereby acquitting the appellant of the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and convicting him for an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage of the appellant with deceased Vijaya was solemnized in the year 1989. On 15.7.1998, deceased Vijaya set herself afire and also set on fire her small child.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried in Sessions Case No.666/1998 before the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, who on 31st August 2001 acquitted him under Section 306 IPC and convicted him under Section 498A IPC. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.251 of 2001 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the conviction under Section 498A IPC. The appeal was heard and dismissed on 3rd March 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 306, 498A
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 113A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cruelty but Acquits of Abetment to Suicide in Dowry Death Case — Insufficient Evidence of Instigation or Direct Link to Suicide. The court held that cruelty under Section 498A IPC was proved but abetment to ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Denial of Water Supply to Illegal Slums in Mumbai. The petition challenges Government Circular dated 4th March 1996 directing no water supply to unauthorized constructions, raising issues of right to w...