High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Granted Leave to Appeal Against Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 151 CPC to condone delay where sufficient cause was shown, permitting the appellant to file appeals.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha Kothari, filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to prefer regular first appeals against a decree passed in a suit for specific performance. The appeals were Regular First Appeal No.971 of 2010, RFA No.972 of 2010, and RFA No.973 of 2010. The respondents in the respective appeals were V. Sathyanarayana Rao and Thirupathi Reddy; B.N. Harshath, B.N. Mynavathi, B.N. Shailaja, and Thirupathi Reddy; and V. Sathyanarayana Rao and V. Shivaji Rao. The appellant was represented by Shri P.D. Surana, while the respondents were represented by Shri S. Gangadhar Aithal and others. The court, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, considered the applications for condonation of delay. The court found that the delay was not intentional and that the appellant had sufficient cause for the delay. Accordingly, the court allowed the miscellaneous civil petitions, condoned the delay, and permitted the appellant to file the appeals. The court directed that the appeals be registered and listed for hearing. The judgment was delivered on 3rd March 2015.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Condonation of Delay - Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Inherent Powers - The court considered whether delay in filing appeals should be condoned. The appellant sought permission to file appeals against a decree in a suit for specific performance. The court held that the delay was not intentional and the appellant had sufficient cause, thus condoned the delay and permitted the appeals to be filed. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned and the appellant permitted to prefer the appeals against the decree in the suit for specific performance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The miscellaneous civil petitions are allowed. The delay is condoned and the appellant is permitted to prefer the appeals. The appeals shall be registered and listed for hearing.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Section 151 CPC
  • Inherent powers of court
  • Liberal approach in condonation
  • Sufficient cause
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (03) 20

Miscellaneous Civil No.9695 of 2010 in Regular First Appeal No.971 of 2010, Misc.Cvl.No.9661 of 2010 in RFA No.972 of 2010, Misc.Cvl.No.8863 of 2010 in RFA No.973 of 2010

2015-03-03

Anand Byrareddy

Shri. P.D. Surana for appellant; Shri. S. Gangadhar Aithal and Shri. N.G. Sreedhar for respondents

Smt. Lalitha Kothari

V. Sathyanarayana Rao, Thirupathi Reddy, B.N. Harshath, B.N. Mynavathi, B.N. Shailaja, V. Shivaji Rao

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Miscellaneous civil petitions seeking permission to file regular first appeals against a decree in a suit for specific performance.

Remedy Sought

Permission to prefer appeals (RFA No.971/2010, RFA No.972/2010, RFA No.973/2010) against the decree.

Filing Reason

Delay in filing the appeals; appellant sought condonation of delay under Section 151 CPC.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned and the appellant permitted to prefer the appeals.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the delay was not intentional and there was sufficient cause for the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 151 CPC to condone delay where sufficient cause was shown, as the delay was not intentional.

Judgment Excerpts

This Miscellaneous Civil filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to permit the appellant to prefer the appeal R.F.A.No.971/2010.

Procedural History

The appellant filed three miscellaneous civil petitions under Section 151 CPC seeking permission to file regular first appeals against a decree. The petitions were heard by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on 3rd March 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Regular First Appeals — Appellant Granted Leave to Appeal Against Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 151 CPC to condone delay ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Amendment Order in Partition Suit for Lack of Due Diligence — Amendment Sought After Trial Concluded and Final Arguments Commenced, Allowing Addition of 12 Properties and 19 Defendants, Held to Be an Abuse of Process Under...