High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Divorce Petition Dismissed for Default in Matrimonial Dispute. Family Court's Rejection of Restoration Application Set Aside for Not Considering Sufficient Cause and Merits....

The petitioner, Siddesh Amrut Anvekar, filed a divorce petition (No. A-1461 of 2012) against his wife, Shwetal Siddesh Anvekar, on grounds of adultery and cruelty. The respondent appeared and filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Maintenance Order in Nullity of Marriage Case — Family Court Erred in Considering Brother's Income for Maintenance Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955...

The petitioner-husband filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15 December 2015 passed by Family Court No.5, Pune, which directed him to pay int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal....

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a common judgment dated 2nd February 2002 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Expulsion Challenge in Sexual Assault Case — Registration of Crime Not Related to Institute Cannot Be Sole Ground for Expulsion Without Disciplinary Proceedings. Expulsion quashed as violative of natural justice; student permitted to continue studies pending criminal trial....

The petitioner, a meritorious student pursuing B.Tech (Computer Engineering) at Mukesh Patel School of Technology Management & Engineering (respondent no.1), was expelled from the institute after a cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Petition of Rape Convict — Notification Barring Parole for Rape Offenders Upheld. Government Notification dated 1/12/2015 prohibits parole for prisoners convicted under Section 376 IPC, and the court found no error in rejecting the parole application....

The petitioner, Ganesh Uttam Kamble, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for the offence of rape and was serving his sentence at Yerwada Central Prison, Pune. He filed an applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Furlough for Convict Under Section 376 IPC. Prisoners Convicted of Rape Are Not Eligible for Furlough as Per Government Notification Dated 1st December 2015....

The petitioner, Umesh Gajanan Patil, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the offence of rape. He applied for furlough on 26th November 2016, which was rejected by order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Parole Petition Due to Pending Appeal — Notification Bars Parole for Prisoners with Appeals Pending Before Higher Forum. The court upheld the rejection of parole for a convict whose appeal was pending, relying on the government notification dated 26/8/2016....

The petitioner, Panu Navshya Bhonar, was a convict whose appeal was pending before the Bombay High Court. He filed an application for parole on 11 November 2016 on the ground of his wife's illness. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Furlough for Prisoner with Pending Appeal. Notification dated 26/8/2016 bars furlough for prisoners whose appeal is pending before a higher forum....

The petitioner, Nandu Savlaram Bhoir, a prisoner, applied for furlough on 16/11/2016. The application was rejected on 17/2/2017. He appealed, but the appeal was dismissed on 28/6/2017. He then filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Alleged Will of 1975 Due to Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Execution. The court held that the propounder must prove due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and failure to lead evidence results in dismissal....

The suit was filed by the plaintiffs, who were great grandsons and other relatives of the deceased, seeking probate of an alleged Will dated 3rd January, 1975 of late Mr.Reginald Cajetan Lobo. The ori...