Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Parole Petition Due to Pending Appeal — Notification Bars Parole for Prisoners with Appeals Pending Before Higher Forum. The court upheld the rejection of parole for a convict whose appeal was pending, relying on the government notification dated 26/8/2016.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Panu Navshya Bhonar, was a convict whose appeal was pending before the Bombay High Court. He filed an application for parole on 11 November 2016 on the ground of his wife's illness. The application was rejected by order dated 20 March 2017. He appealed, but the appeal was dismissed on 12 June 2017. Aggrieved, he filed the present writ petition. The High Court noted that one of the reasons for rejection was that his appeal was pending before the court. As per a government notification dated 26 August 2016, prisoners whose appeals are pending before a higher forum are not entitled to parole. Since the petitioner's appeal was pending before the High Court, the court found no error in the rejection order. The petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged.

Headnote

A) Prison Law - Parole - Pending Appeal - Notification dated 26/8/2016 - The petitioner sought parole on the ground of his wife's illness. The application was rejected because his appeal was pending before the High Court. The Court held that as per the notification, prisoners whose appeals are pending before a higher forum are not entitled to parole. Since the petitioner's appeal was pending, no interference was warranted. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a prisoner whose appeal is pending before a higher forum is entitled to parole under the relevant notification dated 26/8/2016

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed; rule discharged. No interference with the rejection of parole.

Law Points

  • Parole cannot be granted to a prisoner whose appeal is pending before a higher forum as per government notification
  • Parole application rejected on ground of pending appeal is valid
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 163

WRIT PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2017

2017-10-10

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, M.S. Karnik

2017:BHC-AS:27297-DB

Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar (appointed for petitioner), Mr. Arfan Sait (APP for State)

Panu Navshya Bhonar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging rejection of parole application

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought parole on ground of wife's illness

Filing Reason

Parole application rejected due to pending appeal before higher forum

Previous Decisions

Parole application rejected on 20/3/2017; appeal dismissed on 12/6/2017

Issues

Whether the rejection of parole application on the ground of pending appeal is valid under the notification dated 26/8/2016

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for parole on ground of wife's illness State opposed relying on notification barring parole for prisoners with pending appeals

Ratio Decidendi

As per notification dated 26/8/2016, prisoners whose appeals are pending before a higher forum are not entitled to parole. Since the petitioner's appeal was pending before the High Court, the rejection of parole was valid.

Judgment Excerpts

As per Notification dated 26/8/2016, the prisoners whose appeals are pending before higher Forum are not entitled to be released on parole. As stated earlier, the appeal of the petitioner is pending before this Court, hence we cannot find any error in the order rejecting the application of the petitioner for parole.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for parole on 11/11/2016; application rejected on 20/3/2017; appeal dismissed on 12/6/2017; present writ petition filed.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Apportionment of Compensation Among Legal Heirs Set Aside. Court holds that the Land Acquisition Reference Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Lan...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Parole Petition Due to Pending Appeal — Notification Bars Parole for Prisoners with Appeals Pending Before Higher Forum. The court upheld the rejection of parole for a convict whose appeal was pending, relying ...