Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Maintenance Order in Nullity of Marriage Case — Family Court Erred in Considering Brother's Income for Maintenance Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 21
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-husband filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15 December 2015 passed by Family Court No.5, Pune, which directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.25,000 per month to the respondent-wife and provide a one BHK flat or pay Rs.15,000 per month as rent. The marriage was solemnized on 15 November 2013, and within two months, the wife left without consummation. The husband filed a petition for nullity of marriage on the ground of non-consummation. The wife then applied for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, claiming Rs.1,00,000 per month. The Family Court, while allowing the application, considered the income of the petitioner's brother and assets in the brother's name. The High Court held that this was erroneous as Section 24 only permits consideration of the income and property of the spouse against whom maintenance is claimed. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Family Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The court directed the Family Court to decide the application afresh within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Interim Maintenance - Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Consideration of Income of Relatives - The Family Court erred in considering the income of the petitioner's brother and assets standing in the brother's name while awarding interim maintenance to the wife. The court held that under Section 24, only the income and property of the spouse against whom maintenance is claimed can be considered, not that of relatives. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. (Paras 5-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court can consider the income of the petitioner's brother and his family assets while determining interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 15 December 2015 passed by Family Court No.5, Pune is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Family Court for fresh consideration of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, in accordance with law, without being influenced by the observations made in this judgment. The Family Court is directed to decide the application within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Interim maintenance under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act must be based on spouse's own income and needs
  • not on income of relatives
  • Maintenance cannot be granted based on assets of brother or family members
  • Section 24 requires consideration of both parties' income and property
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017:BHC-AS:27223

Writ Petition No.2288 of 2016

2017-10-10

Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

2017:BHC-AS:27223

Mr. Bharat J. Avasarmore for the Petitioner, Mr. Sachin R. Pawar for the Respondent

Shekhar Pandharinath Pokale

Sapana Shekhar Pokale

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 challenging interim maintenance order in nullity of marriage proceedings

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-husband sought quashing of order directing him to pay Rs.25,000 per month maintenance and provide accommodation or pay rent

Filing Reason

Family Court considered income of petitioner's brother and his assets while awarding maintenance

Previous Decisions

Family Court No.5, Pune passed order dated 15 December 2015 below Exhibit-14 in P.A. No.1042 of 2014 granting interim maintenance

Issues

Whether the Family Court can consider the income of the petitioner's brother and his family assets while determining interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Family Court erroneously considered the income of his brother and assets in brother's name, which is not permissible under Section 24 Respondent argued that the order was just and proper

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, while determining interim maintenance, the court can only consider the income and property of the spouse against whom maintenance is claimed, and not the income or assets of relatives such as the spouse's brother.

Judgment Excerpts

The Trial Court, after taking into consideration the income of the Petitioner's brother and his family and the assets, which were standing in the name of the Petitioner's brother, has allowed the said application and granted interim alumni @ Rs.25,000/- per month. Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the Court can consider only the income and property of the spouse against whom maintenance is claimed, and not that of his relatives.

Procedural History

The petitioner-husband filed a petition for nullity of marriage in P.A. No.1042 of 2014 before Family Court No.5, Pune. The respondent-wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for interim maintenance. The Family Court allowed the application by order dated 15 December 2015. The petitioner challenged this order by filing Writ Petition No.2288 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 24
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Maintenance Order in Nullity of Marriage Case — Family Court Erred in Considering Brother's Income for Maintenance Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Capitalization Method. Court enhances compensation for acquired land by applying 10% deduction for ...