High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad hears writ petition challenging sand excavation e-tender notice. Gram Sabha resolution opposing sand excavation and mandatory procedural requirements under Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 are at issue....

The petitioner, Village Panchayat Gandhari, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an e-tender notice dated 15.12.2017 for sand excavation in their village, and to restrain allotment to respondent no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Acquits Husband and Two Women in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Suffer from Material Infirmities and Insufficient Corroboration....

The appeals arose from the judgment of the III Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 331 of 2000, where the trial court convicted the appellants under Section 302 read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partly Allows Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Alters to Section 304 Part I IPC. Conviction Altered on Ground That Assault Occurred in Sudden Fight Without Premeditation, Attracting Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC....

This criminal appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, convicting the appellants (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) under Section 302 read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Property Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law....

The petitioner, a defendant in a suit filed by the first respondent (a public trust), challenged the order dated 12.03.2015 passed by the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC-II, Dharwad, in O.S. No.160...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note Dated 6.9.2017 — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification for Non-Filing of Financial Statements....

The petitioners, Mr. Yenugu Krishna Murthy, Mr. Devarunda Manjegowda Purnesh, and Mr. Manjunath Krishnarajanagar Manikyam, filed three writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification Provisions. The court held that the provision and press release are valid and not violative of Part III of the Constitution....

The petitioners, directors of private limited companies, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Section 164(2)(a) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses University's Appeal in Pensionary Benefits Case for Non-Teaching Staff. Pensionary benefits based on last pay drawn in 2012 cannot be extended beyond 62 years of age as per University regulations....

The case involves an appeal by the University of Mysore against an order of a learned Single Judge in writ petitions filed by four respondents (Dr. H.T. Krishnegowda, Dr. Y.C. Banumathi, Sri S.R. Suda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note Dated 6.9.2017 — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification for Non-Filing of Financial Statements....

The petitioners, Mr. Yenugu Krishna Murthy, Mr. Devarunda Manjegowda Purnesh, and Mr. Manjunath Krishnarajanagar Manikyam, filed three writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor....

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sections 363, 366, and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Execution — Res Judicata Bars Fresh Objection After Earlier Rejection. Objector Cannot Re-agitate Same Issue Under Different Exhibit Number When Earlier Objection Under Section 47 CPC Was Decided on Merits and Attained Finality....

The appellant, Nandkishor Hemraj Khandelwal, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No.2 of 2001 for specific performance of an agreement against respondents No.2 and 3 (defendants). The suit was dec...