Bombay High Court at Aurangabad hears writ petition challenging sand excavation e-tender notice. Gram Sabha resolution opposing sand excavation and mandatory procedural requirements under Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 are at issue.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Village Panchayat Gandhari, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an e-tender notice dated 15.12.2017 for sand excavation in their village, and to restrain allotment to respondent no.6. They argued that the Gram Sabha had passed a resolution opposing sand excavation due to adverse effects on drinking water and irrigation, and that the Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 required Gram Sabha recommendation before auction. The Sub-Divisional Officer overrode the objection. The respondents contended that the procedure was followed, joint survey was conducted, and the Gram Sabha objection was considered and rejected in the interest of revenue and preventing illegal mining. The legal issues involved interpretation of the GR, joint survey requirements, and autonomy of the Gram Panchayat under Article 243 of the Constitution. The Court's decision is not mentioned in the provided text.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the e-tender notice for sand excavation at village Gandhari is valid in light of the Gram Sabha's resolution opposing it and the mandatory provisions of the Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013; whether the sand spot auction could proceed without the Gram Sabha's recommendation and whether the Sub-Divisional Officer properly considered the objection

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 42

Writ Petition No. 632 of 2018

2018-02-27

S.S. Shinde, S.M. Gavhane

Mr.V.D. Sapkal for Petitioner, Mr.S.B. Yawalkar, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 5, Mr.V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel with Mr.A.N. Nagargoje for Respondent No.6

Village Panchayat, Gandhari, Tq. Ambad, Dist. Jalna Through its Sarpanch Ramesh S/o Sukhdeo Niware

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary of Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai32; The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad; The Additional Collector, Jalna; The SubDivisional Officer, Ambad; The Tahsildar, Ambad; Gayatri Enterprises

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the e-tender notice for sand excavation and seeking enforcement of Gram Sabha resolution

Remedy Sought

Quashing of e-tender notice dated 15.12.2017, quashing of letter dated 02.01.2018 from Respondent No.3 to Respondent No.6 for depositing remaining amount, and restrain Respondent No.3 from giving possession of the sand spot at petitioner village to Respondent No.6

Filing Reason

The petitioner Village Panchayat opposed sand excavation due to adverse effects on drinking water and irrigation, and the Gram Sabha passed a resolution opposing the auction, but the authorities included the village in the e-tender notice and overrode the objection

Issues

Whether the sand auction process violated the mandatory requirement of Gram Sabha recommendation under Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 Whether the Sub-Divisional Officer's power to override Gram Sabha objection under GR condition 3(e) is valid Whether the joint survey mandated by the GR was conducted before the auction Whether the auction violated Rule 39A of the aforesaid Rules Whether the Gram Sabha's autonomy under Article 243 of the Constitution was infringed

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Gram Sabha resolution opposed sand excavation due to drinking water and irrigation concerns; Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 made Gram Sabha recommendation mandatory before auction; Sub-Divisional Officer's power to override objection undermines Gram Sabha; joint survey by District Mining Officer, Environment Department, and Senior Geologist was not conducted; auction violated Rule 39A; autonomy of Village Panchayat under Article 243 of Constitution must be honored Respondents: Auction conducted as per Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013; Tahsildar submitted report on 28.06.2017; joint survey was conducted by District Mining Officer and Junior Geologist and report submitted on 13.09.2017; Gram Sabha objection was considered by Sub-Divisional Officer and discarded to prevent illegal excavation and revenue loss; environmental clearance was obtained as per Notification dated 20.01.2016

Judgment Excerpts

Gram Sabha has passed the resolution opposing the sand excavation from the river bed situate in the said village. As per condition No.3, the recommendation of the Gram Sabha is made mandatory before auction of the sand of any particular village. The SubDivisional Officer considered the objection of the Gram Sabha and discarded the same.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed challenging the e-tender notice and the letter. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith, heard finally with consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 243
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Aurangabad hears writ petition challenging sand excavation e-tender notice. Gram Sabha resolution opposing sand excavation and mandatory procedural requirements under Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 are at issue.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportion...