High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased motorcyclist without helmet and license contributed 50% to accident; insurer not liable for no-fault liability under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 20.08.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, in Claim Petition No. 131/2006. The appellant, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Abdul Gaffar. Negligence of Tractor Driver Established; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Enhanced Compensation with Interest....

The case arises from a motor accident claim for the death of Abdul Gaffar, who died in a collision between a motorcycle (on which he was a pillion rider) and a tractor. The claimants, including his wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission....

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging two show-cause/demand notices dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code....

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated 29 July 2009 issued by the Tahs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth....

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010 issued by the Tahsildar, Mulshi, under Section 48...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Senior Citizens Act Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners failed to demonstrate any error or new evidence warranting review of judgment dated 19th May 2020....

The present Review Petition was filed by the original petitioners (Nayana Sudhir Shah, Samkit Sudhir Shah, and Shraddha Sudhir Shah) seeking review of a judgment dated 19th May 2020 passed by the Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Expenditure Claim for Floor Height Raising in Warehouse to Prevent Flood Damage. Expenditure incurred to protect business and retain major customer is revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961....

The appellant, Jetha Properties Private Limited, was a warehouse keeper operating a warehouse in an area prone to severe water logging during monsoon. The appellant's biggest customer, Bombay Dyeing M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Testimony. State Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860....

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment of the Ad-hoc Sessions Judge, Pune, dated 29 November 2002, in Sessions Case No.383 of 2001, acquitting the respondent-accused, Navnath Ab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cheating in Promise-to-Marry Case — Sexual Relationship Under False Promise of Marriage Constitutes Cheating Under Section 417 IPC....

The appellant, Kashinath Narayan Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for the offence punishable under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for cheating. The prosecut...