High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation Under RFCTLARR Act — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Entitlement to Higher Compensation. Court Held That Compensation Determined by Reference Court Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Was Just and Proper Based on Evidence....

The petitioners, legal heirs of original landowners Shrikrishna Mahadev Kokane and Chandrakant Mahadev Kokane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court directs respondents to issue notice to project affected persons before denying rehabilitation benefits....

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased project affected person, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to issue a notice under Section 16(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Project Affe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to RERA Refund Order Alleged Void for Want of Jurisdiction. The Petition Tests Whether Supreme Court's Newtech Decision Renders Final Unappealed RERA Orders Non-Est Under Section 71 of RERA Act....

The writ petition came before the Bombay High Court raising the issue whether an order passed by the RERA Adjudicating Officer directing refund of Rs. 1,35,99,246 with interest was rendered non est by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act, Condoning 258-Day Delay. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Partnership Disputes Arising from Deed of Alteration of Partnership Dated 10 April 2013....

The applicant, Infra Poonam Developers LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a Deed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Bona Fide Claim for Exemption Based on Professional Advice Does Not Amount to Concealment or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars....

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Systems Corporation, a US company, for a consideratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Demolition of Illegal Constructions on Water Bodies in Tamil Nadu. Court Directs Removal of Encroachments and Restoration of Water Bodies to Protect Environment and Public Interest Under Public Trust Doctrine and Article 21....

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various individuals and associations challenging the demolition of constructions on water bodies and river banks in Tamil Nadu, particularly in Coimbatore dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment....

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Systems Corporation, a US company, for a consideratio...