Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Registrar and Deputy Registrar of Maharashtra Nursing Council for Violation of Statutory Rules. Appointment of Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar set aside for non-compliance with Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging the appointments of the Registrar and Deputy Registrar of the Maharashtra Nursing Council. The petitioner in WP/12563/2022, an elected member of the Council, sought to set aside the order dated 02.01.2023 appointing Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar. The petitioner in WP/1800/2023 also challenged similar appointments. The court found that the appointments were made in violation of Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019, which prescribes the procedure for such appointments. The court held that the rules, being delegated legislation, are binding and must be strictly followed. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned appointments and directed the Council to make fresh appointments in accordance with the rules. The court also disposed of the connected civil applications.

Headnote

A) Statutory Interpretation - Appointment to Statutory Posts - Compliance with Rules - The court considered whether the appointments of Registrar and Deputy Registrar of the Maharashtra Nursing Council were made in accordance with Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019. The court held that the appointments were not in compliance with the rules as the selection process did not follow the prescribed procedure. (Paras 1-10)

B) Administrative Law - Delegated Legislation - Binding Nature - The court held that the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019, being delegated legislation, have the force of law and must be strictly complied with. Any appointment made in violation of these rules is illegal and liable to be set aside. (Paras 5-8)

C) Service Law - Appointment - Quashing of Appointment - The court quashed the appointment of Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar, directing the Council to make fresh appointments in accordance with the rules. (Para 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointments of Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar of the Maharashtra Nursing Council were made in accordance with the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019, specifically Rule 5.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the impugned order dated 02.01.2023 appointing Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar, and directed the Maharashtra Nursing Council to make fresh appointments in accordance with the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019. The connected civil applications were disposed of.

Law Points

  • Statutory interpretation
  • Appointment to statutory posts
  • Compliance with delegated legislation
  • Rule 5 of Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules
  • 2019
  • Section 3 of Maharashtra Nursing Council Act
  • 1966
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 156

Writ Petition No. 12563 of 2022 with Civil Application No. 527 of 2023 and Civil Application No. 10719 of 2024, and Writ Petition No. 1800 of 2023

2026-07-01

Kishore C. Sant, Ajit B. Kadethankar

2026:BHC-AUG:25222-DB

Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. A. D. Sonkawade for Petitioner in WP/12563/2022; Mr. N. D. Sonawane h/f Mr. S. S. Kote for Petitioner in WP/1800/2023; Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4/State; Mr. C. A. Jadhav for Respondent No.2

Smt. Anusaya Narayanrao Sawargave (in WP/12563/2022) and Dr. Balasaheb S/o. Laxman Ghule (in WP/1800/2023)

The State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Nursing Council, Mrs. Archana Marotrao Badhe, Dnyaneshwar Raut (in WP/12563/2022); The State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Nursing Council (in WP/1800/2023)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the appointments of Registrar and Deputy Registrar of the Maharashtra Nursing Council.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside the order dated 02.01.2023 appointing Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar, and directing fresh appointments in accordance with the rules.

Filing Reason

The appointments were allegedly made in violation of Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019.

Issues

Whether the appointments of Registrar and Deputy Registrar were made in compliance with Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the appointments were made without following the prescribed procedure under Rule 5 of the Rules, 2019. The respondents contended that the appointments were made in accordance with the rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019, being delegated legislation, have the force of law and must be strictly complied with. Any appointment made in violation of these rules is illegal and liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

Since both the writ petitions are in respect of appointment to the post of Registrar and Deputy Registrar to the Maharashtra Nursing Council, both are being taken up together for final disposal. The petitioner, in WP/12563/2022, happens to be an elected member of the Council, and therefore, is concerned with the affairs of the said Council. By way of amendment, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the impugned order dated 02.01.2023 issued by...

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2022 and 2023 challenging the appointments. The court heard the parties and reserved judgment on 10th June 2026, pronouncing it on 1st July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Nursing Council Act, 1966: Section 3
  • Maharashtra Nursing Council (Election and Appointment) Rules, 2019: Rule 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Registrar and Deputy Registrar of Maharashtra Nursing Council for Violation of Statutory Rules. Appointment of Respondent No.3 as Registrar and Respondent No.4 as Deputy Registrar set aside for non-compliance ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Forgery and Cheating Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Petitioners Accused of Forgery and Cheating Under Sections 468, 471, 420 IPC - FIR Quashed as Allegations Did Not Disclose Any Offence.