Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Orissa Sales Tax Act Revision Limitation Dispute; Revision Orders Subject to 36-Month Time Limit Under Section 12(6) Second Proviso. Majority Holds That Assessment Orders Made by Revising Authority Under Section 23(3) Are Also Orders Under Section 12, Thus Barred After Thirty-Six Months from End of Tax Period....

The State of Orissa preferred appeals by special leave against the judgment of the Orissa High Court in a sales tax matter concerning the time limit for revision orders under the Orissa Sales Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Respondent in Termination of Temporary Government Servant Under Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1949. Termination Simpliciter Under Rule 5 After Preliminary Enquiry Not Punitive and Does Not Attract Article 311(2); Rule 5 Valid Under Article 16....

The appeal arose from a suit filed by a temporary Central Government servant, employed as an officiating Assistant Director Grade II in the Textile Commissioner's office. He challenged the termination...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Protection in Bombay Rent Act Case and Limits High Court Revisional Jurisdiction. Standard Rent Fixation and Eviction Protection Under Sections 11 and 12 of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947, Clarified....

The dispute arose between a landlord and tenant over premises in Baroda, governed by the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947. The tenant occupied the premises at a monthly r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Dismissing Review Petitions in Sales Tax Matter. High Court's Statement That Case Did Not Involve Substantial Question of Law Held to Be Error Apparent on Face of Record Under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC....

The Supreme Court of India considered three civil appeals by special leave against an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated January 6, 1961, dismissing review petitions filed under Order XLVII ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Indian Railways Act Refund Case; Section 26 Bar Not Applicable to Excess Wharfage or Demurrage Collection. Refund Suit Maintainable as Act Provided No Remedy Before Railway Rates Tribunal for Excess Terminal Charges Under Indian Railways Act, 1890 Sections 3(14), 26, 32, 41, 45....

The Supreme Court considered six civil appeals by special leave arising from suits filed by a firm carrying on business in Surendranagar against the Union of India representing the Western Railway for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Indian Railways Act Refund Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred by Section 26. Section 26 Bar Limited to Matters for Which Act Provides a Remedy; Wharfage and Demurrage Charges Are Terminals Under Section 3(14) of Indian Railways Act, 1890....

The dispute arose from six civil appeals filed by special leave against the judgment of the Bombay High Court at Rajkot, which had upheld the dismissal of suits filed by the appellant firm against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal's Set-off and Transfer of Unclaimed Dividends in Life Insurance Nationalisation Dispute. Liability for Unclaimed Dividends Pertaining to Controlled Business Vests in Life Insurance Corporation Under Section 7(1) of Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, and Insurer Entitled to 4% Interest on Compensation....

The General Assurance Society Ltd., a composite insurer carrying on both life and general insurance business, appealed by special leave against the order dated February 17, 1958 of the Life Insurance ...