Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions....

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited, and the respondent, Hitro Energy Solutions Privat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Premature Retirement Order of Head Constable Under Fundamental Rules and CCS (Pension) Rules. The Court Held That Judicial Review of Compulsory Retirement Is Limited to Mala Fides, Arbitrariness, or Perversity, and Entire Service Record Including Old Adverse Entries and Uncommunicated Remarks Can Be Considered....

The appeal arose from an order of the Delhi High Court that set aside the premature retirement of a Head Constable under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules read with Rule 48(1)(b) of the CCS (Pension...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Industrial Disputes Act Case Due to Labour Court's Jurisdictional Overreach. Labour Court Exceeded Authority Under Section 33(C)(2) by Adjudicating Seriously Disputed Employer-Employee Relationship Without Prior Recognition of Claim....

The dispute arose from an application filed by respondent No.2 before the Labour Court under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, demanding difference of wages from 01.04.2006 to 31....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Reliable Evidence and Forensic Confirmation. Life Sentence Imposed Under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act Sustained as Lower Courts Properly Assessed Eyewitness Testimonies and Forensic Reports Despite Procedural Issues....

The appeals arose from a High Court judgment convicting the appellants for life under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, while acquitting them under Section 307 IPC. The case involved the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Reliable Eyewitness Testimony. The court affirmed the life sentence under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and one-and-a-half-year sentence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, finding minor inconsistencies in witness statements did not affect core identification of the assailants....

The appeal arose from a murder case where the appellant, along with others, was convicted for the murder of Rajinder alias Raju on October 1, 2008, under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Fraud Case Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. - High Court's refusal to quash proceedings set aside as F.I.R. lacked prima facie evidence against accused for offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC, with allegations limited to purchase of property not under attachment....

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by the original complainant, leading to an F.I.R. registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Regarding Lok Adalat Award as Basis for Compensation Redetermination. Court Held That Lok Adalat Award Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Does Not Qualify as Determination by 'Court' Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Based on Compromise and Lacks Adjudicatory Function....

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in relation to Awards passed by Lok Adalats under the Legal Services Auth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Hindu Marriage Act Divorce Case, Upholding High Court's Finding of No Cruelty. Appeal Under Family Courts Act Held Timely as Section 29(2) of Limitation Act Applies, Not Section 29(3), and Allegations of Cruelty Fail Due to Respondent's Justified Absence from Matrimonial Home....

The dispute arose from a marriage solemnized under Hindu rites on 29-08-1999 between the appellant-husband and respondent-wife. The appellant filed a petition for divorce on 05-03-2001 under Section 1...