Search Results for "zero rated supplies"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "zero rated supplies"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

7 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST Paid on Exported Goods Despite Claim of Higher Drawback Rate. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST under Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act read with Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, as selection of higher drawback column does not disentitle refund.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kunal Housewares Private Limited, exported stainless steel household articles in July, August, and September 2017. The petitioner paid...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Petitioner is Entitled to Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit Under GST Laws. The Court Examines Whether the Petitioner Company Supplying Services to Foreign Group Companies Qualifies as an 'Agent' Under Section 2(5) of CGST Act.

16 Jun 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged two Orders-in-Appeal dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows GST Refund Claim for Export of Services, Holds That Unjust Enrichment Provisions Do Not Apply When Tax Incidence Is Not Passed On to Any Person in India. The Court interpreted Section 54(8)(d) of CGST Act, 2017 and held that in case of export of services, the foreign client is not a 'person' for the purpose of unjust enrichment, and the refund cannot be rejected on that ground.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Jar Productions Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, engaged in providing production services to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows IGST Refund to Exporter Despite Initial Error in GST Return. Inadvertent Mistake in Invoice Number and Port Code in GSTR-1 Does Not Bar Refund of IGST on Zero-Rated Supply Under Section 16(3) of IGST Act, 2017.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Sunlight Cable Industries, exported insulated cables to M/s. Khin Maung Tum & Brothers Co. Ltd., Myanmar, and paid Integrated Goods an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST with Interest for Zero-Rated Export Supplies Under CGST and IGST Acts. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST paid on export of goods along with interest from date of shipping bill till actual refund.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Shri Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Appellate Order Denying GST Refund on Export of Services to Overseas Entity, Holds Non-Submission of FIRCs Not Fatal When Alternative Proof Exists. The Court Rules that Services Provided on Principal-to-Principal Basis Are Not Intermediary Services Under Section 2(13) of IGST Act, and Directs Refund.

22 Aug 2024

The petitioner, a company providing information technology and software services, filed four applications for refund of unutilized input tax credit (I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

8 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

High Court

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

14 Nov 2024

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)