Search Results for "wrong pay fixation"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner entitled to pay re-fixation from promotion date and junior's promotion dates with 6% interest on delayed arrears.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, entitled to re-fixation of basic pay from promotion date and interest on delayed payment under Article 226.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Lease Rent Hikes Based on Ready Reckoner Rates. State Government Ordered to Frame New, Fair Policy for Lease Rent Determination Following Landmark Judgment.

The challenge against the State Government's methodology for calculating lease rent for residential lands based on Ready Reckoner rates. The Petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was grante...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Employee in Excess Payment Recovery Case — Recovery from Pension Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension quashed as no opportunity of hearing was given before ordering recovery.

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer Statistics by the respondent no.5 on 19.10.1994. He was granted higher p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Teacher Seeking Pay Scale Revision and Pension Benefits. Petitioner's service as Assistant Teacher from 1972 to 1998 entitled to benefits under 5th Pay Commission and pension scheme.

The petitioner, Babulal Rama Thakre, was employed as an Assistant Teacher with Respondent No. 4, a secondary school, from 1972 until his retirement in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Post-Retirement Re-Fixation of Pay Without Notice. Re-fixation of pay after retirement without affording opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Naeem Ahmedkhan s/o Dilawarkhan, a retired government servant, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...