Search Results for "winding up petition"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing First Appeal Against Summary Suit Decree. No Sufficient Cause Shown for 3-Year Delay as Appellant Failed to Explain Critical Period When Limitation Was Operational Under Section 15 of Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948.

The dispute involved an application seeking condonation of delay of 3 years and 60 days in filing a first appeal against a decree, judgment and order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Property Sale During Company Liquidation - Court Validates Transaction Under Companies Act

An interim application sought to declare a sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 as unaffected by Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, and to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Resolving Legal Ambiguities and Clarifying Recovery Mechanisms Navigating the Intersection of Statutes of Limitation and Debt Recovery in India

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Appeals arising from judgments of the High Court of Punja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 Due to Lack of Bona Fide Dispute. Concurrent Findings Upheld as Appellant's Defence Was Vague and Non-Specific in Reply to Statutory Notice Under Sections 433(e) and 434.

The dispute arose from a transaction where the respondent, a manufacturer of acrylic yarn, supplied material on credit to the appellant. The appellant...