Search Results for "voluntary retirement"

382 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement Notice Before Intended Date in Service Matter - Rule 65 MCS (Pension) Rules, 1982 Does Not Bar Withdrawal. Senior Clerk's Withdrawal Request Made on Same Day Before Retirement Time Held Valid, Rejection Set Aside.

The petitioner, Vithal s/o Lingoji Kalyankar, was a Senior Clerk in the District Court at Nanded, having joined service on 06.06.1988. After about 30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Allowing Voluntary Retirement of Assistant. Rule 48-A of CCS Pension Rules Prevails Over Administrative Circulars and Fundamental Rule 56(k)(1) — Employer's Rejection on Grounds of Staff Shortage Held Arbitrary.

The Union of India and others (petitioners) challenged the order dated 01.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer's Challenge to Rejection of Voluntary Retirement. Central Government's Decision to Reject Voluntary Retirement Upheld as Disciplinary Proceedings Were Contemplated and Petitioner Was Not Clear from Vigilance Angle.

The petitioner, a 1997 batch IPS officer of Maharashtra Cadre, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Assistant Teacher in Private Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 5 of M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. Termination order set aside as no prior approval was obtained from the Education Officer before dismissal.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Raosaheb Kulkarni, was an assistant teacher employed by the Rasta Peth Education Society, which runs a private aided school...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Milk Union Retrenchment Cases. Retrenchment of Daily Wagers Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Solapur Zilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh, a cooperative milk union, challenged multiple awards passed by the Labour Court, Solapur, i...