Search Results for "video transcript"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Rape and Cyber Crime Case — Petitioner Allegedly Committed Repeated Rape and Recorded Obscene Videos of Complainant, but Court Found No Prima Facie Case of Custodial Interrogation Needed

The petitioner, Prajwal Revanna, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Against Husband in Suicide Abetment Case. Petitioner Contended That Victim's Depression and Video Statement Negated Instigation, Relying on Precedents Interpreting Section 306 IPC and Section 498A IPC.

The petitioner, the husband of the deceased, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Recall of PW5 for Cross-Examination via Video Conferencing Under Section 311 Cr.P.C. — Recall Not Permissible as Witness Already Cross-Examined and No New Evidence Sought

The petitioner, Mahadev, was the accused in C.C. No. 94/2017 pending before the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Vijayapur. The case arose ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Accused's Appeal for Cloned Copy of Memory Card in Rape Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Victim's Privacy. Electronic Record Held to be 'Document' Under Evidence Act and IPC, Entitling Accused to Copy Under Section 207 CrPC.

The appellant, P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep, was arrayed as accused No. 8 in a case registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...