Search Results for "vehicle manufacturing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "vehicle manufacturing"

189 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 189 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Managing Director and President of Ford India and Car Dealer Directors in Alleged Fraud Case. Sale of Used Car Disguised as New Model Leads to Allegations of Cheating and Forgery, but Court Finds No Involvement of Manufacturer.

27 Jun 2018

The judgment of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dealt with three criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Vehicle Defect Case — Manufacturer Not Vicariously Liable for Independent Dealer's Service Deficiencies. Concurrent Findings of Lower Fora Set Aside as No Privity of Contract Exists Between Manufacturer and Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act.

18 Jun 2025

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the Managing Director of TATA Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited before the National Consumer Disputes Redre...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Transport Officer in Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Matter — Vehicle Classification as Transport Vehicle Affirmed. Division Bench Holds that N1 Category Vehicle Used for Carriage of Goods Must Be Registered as Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(47) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 2(p) of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

20 Jul 2026

The dispute centered on the registration classification of a Mahindra Bolero Camper 4WD PSD vehicle purchased by the respondent, Dhilip Kumar. The veh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Automotive Manufacturer in Octroi Exemption Dispute — Chassis and Parts for Assembly Included Under 'Motor Vehicles' Entry. Entry in Table of Rates for Octroi, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, interpreted to include components essential for manufacture of motor vehicles, applying beneficial construction and noscitur a sociis.

4 Aug 2006

The case involves a reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arising from an ambiguity in a Division Bench judgment in Bajaj Tempo Limited...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

7 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

8 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

9 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification of Electric Bicycle — EBikeMatrix Held to Be a Bicycle Under Schedule Entry C14 of MVAT Act, 2002. The court held that a bicycle with an auxiliary electric motor of less than 0.5 KW and battery backup is a 'bicycle' under Entry C14, taxable at 4%, not 12.5%.

6 May 2010

The appellant, M/s R.K. Rim Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of bicycles, started producing a product called 'EBikeMatrix', which is a bicycle with an auxili...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Rules on Motor Vehicle Alteration Over Central Prototype Norms. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules permit structural alterations with registering authority's approval, overriding Central Motor Vehicle Rules' restriction on deviation from prototype test.

9 Jan 2019

The case involved a conflict of judicial opinion in the Kerala High Court regarding the permissibility of structural alterations to motor vehicles tha...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)