downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
Search Results for "unutilised input tax credit"
25 result(s) found
Found 25 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
16 Jul 2025The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...
- 86
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules Valid Despite Absence of Specific Enabling Provision in Parent Act at Time of Introduction. Input Tax Credit is a Facility, Not a Vested Right; State Can Restrict ITC on Stock-in-Trade to Reduced Tax Rate.
4 Mar 2025The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Punjab against a High Court judgment that had struck down Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Ta...
- 414
High Court
GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.
14 Nov 2024The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...
- 333
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.
3 Oct 2024The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...
- 1338
High Court
High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.
20 Aug 2024The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...
- 361
High Court
Karnataka High Court examines blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenge orders blocking electronic credit ledger without hearing, contending violation of natural justice and fundamental rights.
27 Jul 2023The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, by several pe...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.
20 Mar 2020The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.
14 Jun 2019The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...
- 159
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.
20 Mar 2018A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...
