Search Results for "unnatural intercourse"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Forcible Sexual Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Angad Tikaram Chandane, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 417 (cheating) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellant, Amol Meshram, was convicted by the 7th Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.208/1998 for an offence punishable under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Maroti s/o Domaji Sadmake, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly raping a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376, 451, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Martand Ramchandra Lohkare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 451 (house-tre...