Search Results for "undesirable name"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Directing Deletion of 'National' from Trust Name in Suo Motu Revision Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act — Joint Charity Commissioner Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain Complaint After Inquiry Report Found No Violation Under Section 37.

The petitioner, National Egg Co-ordination Committee, a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (MPT Act), ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trust Registration Under Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 — Petitioner Lacks Standing as Trust Not Registered. Dispute over rival claims to manage a trust cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction; proper remedy is civil suit.

The petitioner, claiming to be the Vice Chairman of Krantiveer Sangolli Rayanna Residential High School Trust, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Registration of Society with Identical Name. Inspector General of Societies Directed to Issue Directions Under Section 12A(5) of Societies Registration Act, 1860 to Change Name of Society Registered with Identical Name as Existing Society.

The petitioner, Sociedade Patriotica Dos Baldios Das Novas Conquistas, was a society registered under erstwhile Portuguese laws approximately between ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Register 'Rashtriya Swayansevak Sangh' as a Society. Section 3A of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 Bars Registration of a Society with a Name Identical to an Existing Registered Society.

The petitioner, Janardan Moon, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 4 October 2017 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Societies, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...