Search Results for "unconstitutional provisions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "unconstitutional provisions"

1334 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1334 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

1 Jan 2021

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Landowners' Challenge to Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws Revival Act, 2019 on Grounds of Separation of Powers and Constitutional Invalidity. The Court held that legislative revival of enactments declared unconstitutional due to repugnancy under Article 254 of the Constitution is impermissible without re-enactment and fresh Presidential assent, as it overrules judicial determination and violates constitutional limits.

29 Jun 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction writ petition, addressed a constitutional dispute concerning the separation of powers and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FCRA Amendments in Challenge by NGOs — Restrictions on Foreign Contribution Transfers and Mandatory Account in SBI New Delhi Held Reasonable. Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sections 7, 12(1A), 12A, and 17(1) of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as Not Violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21.

8 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns the constitutional validity of amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) introduced by the Foreign Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree Held Valid. The Explanation defining 'partition' as only by registered deed or court decree is not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14, 15, or 21 of the Constitution.

19 Feb 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased original petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Constitutional Validity of Land Ceiling Provisions; Compensation at Fifteen Times Fair Rent Not Violative as Original Law Never Operative.

15 Jul 1969

The State of Orissa appealed against the Orissa High Court judgment that declared Chapter IV of the Orissa Land Reforms (Amendment) Act 13 of 1965 unc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Amendment) Act, 1996. Petitioner Trade Unions Contend Amendment is Retrograde and Repugnant to Central Act, Requiring Presidential Assent.

10 Oct 2006

The Bombay High Court, in its Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, heard three writ petitions filed by trade unions namely Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sangh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree is Valid and Not Unconstitutional. The court held that the Explanation defining partition as only by registered deed or court decree is within legislative competence and does not violate fundamental rights.

19 Feb 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B Patil, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

12 Jun 2015

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Amendment to CPC Fixing 120-Day Limit for Written Statement; Challenge to Provisions Curtailing Judicial Discretion and Inherent Powers. The Amendment, Introduced by State Legislature, Allegedly Overrides Supreme Court Ruling and Violates Articles 14 and 141 of the Constitution.

28 Jul 2026

The High Court of Karnataka entertained two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional validi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to FCRA Provisions on Political Nature Declaration. Right to Receive Foreign Contribution Not a Fundamental Right Under Article 19; Guidelines in Rule 3 Not Vague or Arbitrary.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), a registered society involved in resisting globalization, combating communalism, and defending demo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)