Search Results for "unclaimed amounts"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 17. Cooperative Bank's Recovery Action Upheld as Writ Not Maintainable When Statutory Remedy Exists.

The petitioners, Pimpri Chinchwad Sahakari Bank Maryadit and its Special Recovery Officer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of VAT and Unclaimed Purchases in Taxable Turnover Calculation. State of Gujarat's Appeal Dismissed; High Court and Tribunal's Interpretation of GVAT Act Affirmed

The Appellant challenged the High Court of Gujarat's judgment affirming the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal's (Tribunal) decision in favor of Respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Official Liquidator to Keep Provision for EPF Claims in Winding Up of Navinon Limited. Court Directs Refund of Excess Payment to EPF Office Kandivali.

This judgment arises from Official Liquidator's Report No.517 of 2015 in Company Petition No.1176 of 2001, concerning M/s.Navinon Limited (In Liquidat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Period for Obtaining Certified Copy Not Excludable Under Section 12(2) of Limitation Act, 1963 for Filing Under Section 34.

The petitioner, Jenjon Retail and Services Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Despite Separate Trials for Multiple Cheques. Dishonour of three cheques treated as separate offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, but separate trials not resulting in prejudice.

The dispute between the complainant Nilesh P. Salgaonkar and the accused Deelip Apte involved three cheques issued by the accused to the complainant, ...