Search Results for "tripartite development agreement"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Redevelopment Contract Dispute. Non-Cooperating Members of Cooperative Housing Society Face Motion for Injunction and Mandatory Orders.

The plaintiff, a developer, filed suit for specific performance of a redevelopment contract against a cooperative housing society and some of its non-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.

The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MMRDA's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Powai Land Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's interpretation of tripartite agreement regarding lease premium and development charges under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an arbitration petition filed by Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) and the State of Maharashtra under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application in PIL on Powai Area Development Scheme and Tripartite Agreement. Court Extends Construction Timelines for Certain Buildings and Defers Others, Reaffirming Prior Directions to Complete Affordable Housing Units Under the Scheme.

These three public interest litigations concerned the development of vast lands at Powai in Mumbai under the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012

The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...