Search Results for "transfer pendente lite"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "transfer pendente lite"

109 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Impleadment in Regular Appeal — Assignment of Decree Not Proved as Required Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. The court held that an application under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment based on assignment of a decree must be supported by proper proof of the assignment deed, including examination of attesting witnesses and opportunity for cross-examination.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a regular appeal (R.A.No.31/2022) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM at Ramanagara, challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Impleadment in Regular Appeal — Assignment of Decree Without Court Permission Invalid Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. The court held that any assignment or creation of interest pendente lite requires prior permission of the court under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC, and without such permission, the assignee cannot be impleaded as a party.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs No.2 to 6 in a suit, filed a Regular Appeal (R.A.No.31/2022) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM at R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree-Holder's Execution Against Pendente Lite Purchaser in Possession Suit. Held that a purchaser pendente lite is bound by the decree and can be dispossessed in execution under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC without a separate suit.

20 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Kashinath Ramji Shinde (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a suit in 1987 seeking possession, declaration, and mesne p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment of Pendente Lite Transferee in Property Suit — Doctrine of Lis Pendens Does Not Render Transfer Void Ab Initio. The Court held that a transferee with knowledge of pending litigation may be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC if necessary for effective adjudication, and the High Court erred in nullifying the sale deed based on Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

21 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the dismissal of an impleadment application by the Rajasthan High Court. The appellant, along with others,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioners Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Leasehold Rights Acquired Pending Suit Are Subject to Lis Pendens and Do Not Entitle Impleadment.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Sandeep Ramesh Solanki and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Appointment of Administrator in Testamentary Case — Upholds Right of Son to Challenge Will on Ground of Undue Influence and Suspicious Circumstances. The court held that the propounder of a will must remove all suspicious circumstances, and the appointment of an administrator pendente lite under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, should not be made without considering the caveator's serious objections.

25 Apr 2019

The appeal arises from a testamentary dispute concerning the estate of Amardeep Singh Sujan Singh Chadha (the testator). The testator died on 5th Octo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

19 Nov 2013

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.

8 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)